Teams

OC Meta Serve - LPC - Deping

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-09vs OC LLW CMTC - Tricia - Sat1Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDeping Liu / Isabelle Krenz vs Cindy Carpenter / Cathy Jackson6-7, 4-6
2025-07-26vs OC LLW CMTC - Tricia - Sat1Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSusie Xie / Deping Liu vs Irene Fehr / Tricia Bregman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJunko Noguchi / LanChi Bui vs Cathy Jackson / Cindy Carpenter1-6, 4-6
2025-07-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWeimin Sun / Deping Liu vs Diana Hirst / Sonia Walker2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesIsabelle Krenz / Susie Xie vs Jennifer Budzak / Gloria Medina1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChristine Ly / Deping Liu vs Diana Hirst / Teri Matheny6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDeping Liu / Christine Ly vs Mary Goff / Kim Webster5-7, 4-6
2025-06-07vs OC LLW CMTC - Tricia - Sat1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeping Liu / Teresa Beisel vs Teresa Mittman / Laura O'Leary1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJunko Noguchi / Michelle Sinclair vs Char Geary / Margaret Drugan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeping Liu / Weimin Sun vs Susan Tibbetts / Vicki Brown4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Michelle Sinclair
published
3.33
Susie Xie
published
3.29
Christine Ly
published 3.5
3.20
Isabelle Krenz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Carol Melvin
published 3.5
3.06
Deping Liu
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.06
Ann Stevenson
published 3.5
3.05
Junko Noguchi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Susan Welsh
published
LanChi Bui
published
Teresa Beisel
published
Weimin Sun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Stevenson + Carol Melvin224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Welsh + Teresa Beisel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Sinclair
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.63
Susie Xie
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Christine Ly
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Isabelle Krenz
43W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carol Melvin
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Deping Liu
86W–111L career · 7 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Ann Stevenson
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Junko Noguchi
72W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Susan Welsh
8W–26L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
LanChi Bui
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Beisel
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Weimin Sun
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.