Teams

OC LLW CMTC - Tricia - Sat1

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-09vs OC Meta Serve - LPC - DepingWon 10
W#1 DoublesTricia Bregman / Hillary Mayne vs Michelle Sinclair / LanChi Bui3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLisabeth Grimm / Cathy Jackson vs Nancy Jewell / Kate Cameron6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTricia Bregman / Teresa Mittman vs Vicki Brown / Susan Tibbetts6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDee Harriman / Laura O'Leary vs AMY MAO / Leona Tohill2-6, 3-6
2025-07-26vs OC Meta Serve - LPC - DepingWon 20
W#1 DoublesDee Harriman / Laura O'Leary vs Joy Peterson / Weimin Sun6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesIrene Fehr / Tricia Bregman vs Susie Xie / Deping Liu6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCathy Jackson / Lisabeth Grimm vs Jennifer Budzak / Karen Holmes7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTricia Bregman / Dana Dotoli vs Kim Webster / Shelli Banko6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Ren / Dee Harriman vs Sharon Diekneit / Helen Garner6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIrene Fehr / Teresa Mittman vs Margaret Drugan / Char Geary6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Hudson / Kaeko Jenni vs Nancy Jewell / Naomi Sugiura6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDee Harriman / Teresa Mittman vs Karen Holmes / Shelli Banko7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaeko Jenni / Irene Fehr vs Diane Kimbro / Xuan Le4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCathy Jackson / Lisabeth Grimm vs Leona Tohill / Christine Bullette6-2, 6-2
2025-06-07vs OC Meta Serve - LPC - DepingSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisabeth Grimm / Cathy Jackson vs Joy Peterson / Susan Welsh6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaeko Jenni / Elizabeth Sanders vs Christine Ly / Susie Xie4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesTeresa Mittman / Tricia Bregman vs Sharon Diekneit / Mary Goff5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Cathy Jackson
published 4
3.55
Hillary Mayne
published 4
3.39
Tricia Bregman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Irene Fehr
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Laura Ren
published
3.30
Laura O'Leary
published
3.29
Dee Harriman
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.29
Kaeko Jenni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Dana Dotoli
published 3.5
3.24
Lisabeth Grimm
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.67
Cindy Carpenter
published 3
Maria des Dorides
published
Teresa Mittman
published
Wendy Hudson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dee Harriman + Tricia Bregman8254% games+4.8% vs expected
Tricia Bregman + Irene Fehr3262% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Bregman + Kaeko Jenni303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Jackson
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Hillary Mayne
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Tricia Bregman
114W–117L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Irene Fehr
99W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Laura Ren
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Laura O'Leary
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dee Harriman
60W–62L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
94W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Dana Dotoli
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lisabeth Grimm
63W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Cindy Carpenter
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Maria des Dorides
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Mittman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Hudson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.