Teams

OC Forty Love LPC - Diekneit - Sun11

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Julia Gissel vs Nancy Jewell / Naomi Sugiura6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHelen Garner / Jennifer Budzak vs AMY MAO / Kate Cameron6-7, 4-6
2025-08-02vs OC Meta Serve - LPC - DepingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Julia Gissel vs Michelle Sinclair / LanChi Bui4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Budzak / Helen Garner vs Susan Welsh / Teresa Beisel6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Julia Gissel vs Diana Hirst / Sonia Walker6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Goff / Kim Webster vs Kate Cameron / Nancy Jewell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHelen Garner / Karen Holmes vs Sheri Hall / Naomi Sugiura6-4, 6-3
2025-07-20vs OC LLW CMTC - Tricia - Sat1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Budzak / Karen Holmes vs Cathy Jackson / Lisabeth Grimm6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Helen Garner vs Laura Ren / Dee Harriman3-6, 3-6
2025-07-13vs OC Meta Serve - LPC - DepingWon 20
W#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Mary Goff vs Joy Peterson / Susan Welsh6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Budzak / Gloria Medina vs Isabelle Krenz / Susie Xie6-1, 7-5
2025-06-15vs OC Meta Serve - LPC - DepingWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Diane Miller vs Michelle Sinclair / LanChi Bui6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Goff / Kim Webster vs Deping Liu / Christine Ly7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Holmes / Helen Garner vs Weimin Sun / Joy Peterson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Kim Webster vs Diana Hirst / Sonia Walker2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Garner / Jennifer Budzak vs Leona Tohill / Christine Bullette4-6, 2-6
2025-06-01vs OC LLW CMTC - Tricia - Sat1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Mary Goff vs Teresa Mittman / Tricia Bregman7-5, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Diane Kimbro
published 4
3.41
Gloria Medina
published 3.5
3.40
Mary Goff
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Jennifer Budzak
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Julia Gissel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Sharon Diekneit
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Shelli Banko
published
3.19
Xuan Le
published
3.15
Helen Garner
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.60
Wanda Shimazu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Diekneit + Mary Goff341358% games−1.6% vs expected
Jennifer Budzak + Helen Garner4359% games−4.5% vs expected
Sharon Diekneit + Julia Gissel141255% games−6.7% vs expected
Julia Gissel + Helen Garner3258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Kimbro
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Gloria Medina
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Mary Goff
74W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Jennifer Budzak
47W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Julia Gissel
34W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Sharon Diekneit
186W–204L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Shelli Banko
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Xuan Le
32W–16L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Helen Garner
46W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Wanda Shimazu
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.