Teams

GCC GOLD

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-31vs CHCC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarissa Sproles / Judith Pearson vs Courtney Berglund / Carlee Steck6-1, 7-5
2023-05-24vs GNO REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Sloan / Marissa Sproles vs Jennifer Delaney / Lauren Turra6-4, 6-2
2023-05-17vs EM GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Ann Erb / Sarah Olney7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-03vs VC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesIlana Larson / Alicia Sloan vs Nancy Fridstein / Megan Kane6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-19vs WP-O NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesIlana Larson / Marissa Sproles vs Kala Koehn / Sarah Warsh6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Rebecca Orcutt
published
2.68
Judith Pearson
published
2.66
Marissa Sproles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Ilana Larson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Katie Terwilliger
published
Alicia Sloan
published 2.5
2.24
Caitlyn van Valin
published 2.5
2.11
Sachi Osatinski
published
Priscilla Stinar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caitlyn van Valin + Priscilla Stinar3351% games+4.2% vs expected
Ilana Larson + Marissa Sproles452655% games−3.6% vs expected
Rebecca Orcutt + Sachi Osatinski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Orcutt
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
Judith Pearson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Marissa Sproles
61W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Ilana Larson
72W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Katie Terwilliger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Alicia Sloan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Caitlyn van Valin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.24
Sachi Osatinski
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Priscilla Stinar
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.