WP-O NAVY
2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings34 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1SV RED | 6 | 1 | 12 | 135 |
| 2CHCC PURPLE | 6 | 1 | 14 | 139 |
| 3HW GOLD | 6 | 1 | 15 | 158 |
| 4PTC GREEN | 6 | 1 | 23 | 189 |
| 5CM NAVY | 5 | 2 | 16 | 150 |
| 6LPTC RED | 5 | 2 | 16 | 152 |
| 7DTP NAVY | 5 | 2 | 16 | 145 |
| 8BRMST BRONZE | 5 | 2 | 17 | 143 |
| 9PH PINK | 5 | 2 | 22 | 168 |
| 10GAC GOLD | 4 | 3 | 20 | 161 |
| 11RRTC RED | 4 | 3 | 20 | 163 |
| 12MVCC RED | 4 | 3 | 21 | 179 |
| 13KNO GREEN | 4 | 3 | 21 | 182 |
| 14WP-O NAVY | 4 | 3 | 23 | 196 |
| 15RCC YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 26 | 188 |
| 16HW PINK | 4 | 3 | 26 | 198 |
| 17BCST GREEN | 3 | 3 | 17 | 143 |
| 18GCC GOLD | 3 | 4 | 20 | 158 |
| 19SKY PINK | 3 | 4 | 20 | 169 |
| 20LEBTC NAVY | 3 | 4 | 23 | 179 |
| 21VCC TEAL | 3 | 4 | 25 | 174 |
| 22WC TEAL | 3 | 4 | 26 | 189 |
| 23WP-G TEAL | 3 | 4 | 30 | 197 |
| 24CPV PINK | 2 | 5 | 24 | 164 |
| 25GNO RED | 2 | 5 | 27 | 202 |
| 26CACM YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 28 | 210 |
| 27CCV YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 28 | 210 |
| 28KC-RH ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 29 | 193 |
| 29HV BLUE | 2 | 5 | 30 | 208 |
| 30APR-U GREEN | 1 | 6 | 27 | 205 |
| 31DCHS BLUE | 1 | 6 | 34 | 208 |
| 32GR ORANGE | 0 | 7 | 30 | 211 |
| 33HG NAVY | 0 | 7 | 35 | 225 |
| 34RHCC ORANGE | 0 | 7 | 37 | 235 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Hillary Locke + Maddison Swanson | 6–1 | 70% games | +19.0% vs expected |
| Leslie Wicks + Hillary Locke | 7–1 | 63% games | +16.1% vs expected |
| Leslie Wicks + Maddison Swanson | 4–1 | 62% games | +8.9% vs expected |
| Kala Koehn + Tara Wiebe | 5–1 | 64% games | +3.7% vs expected |
| Tara Wiebe + Sarah Warsh | 8–12 | 46% games | +1.5% vs expected |
| Kala Koehn + Sarah Warsh | 4–6 | 51% games | −2.4% vs expected |
| Leslie Wicks + Hilary Bresner | 3–4 | 45% games | −5.2% vs expected |
| Hillary Locke + Hilary Bresner | 1–4 | 42% games | −9.5% vs expected |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.