Teams

VC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs GNO REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesMeridith Burrows / Kate Patton vs Tonya Fallows / Marni Warren7-5, 6-4
2023-05-24vs EM GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesMeridith Burrows / Annie Cordova vs Dana Keefe / Ann Erb4-6, 1-6
2023-05-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnnie Cordova vs Martha Symko-Davies6-2, 6-4
2023-05-17vs WP-G TEALLost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Patton / Joyce Aycock vs Sara Singh / Johanna Bentson2-6, 1-6
2023-05-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnnie Cordova vs Kelly Wilson6-1, 7-6
2023-04-26vs WP-O NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesTraci Samaras / Megan Kane vs Kala Koehn / Sarah Warsh3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKate Patton vs Tara Wendt1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-19vs CHCC PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Patton / Traci Samaras vs Kendra Abbott / Stacey Moreno1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Annie Cordova
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Kate Patton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Traci Samaras
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Joyce Aycock
published
2.28
Nancy Fridstein
published
2.18
Kathleen Nisbet
published
2.15
Meridith Burrows
published
Joanie Mankus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Samaras + Meridith Burrows4449% games+2.7% vs expected
Annie Cordova + Kate Patton31042% games−4.0% vs expected
Traci Samaras + Kate Patton101152% gamesnot enough data
Traci Samaras + Nancy Fridstein4155% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Joanie Mankus033 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Nancy Fridstein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annie Cordova
40W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Kate Patton
72W–120L career · 4 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
2.5
Traci Samaras
68W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%74%26%
2.41
Joyce Aycock
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%83%17%
2.37
Nancy Fridstein
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.28
Kathleen Nisbet
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Meridith Burrows
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.15
Joanie Mankus
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.