Teams

1PEACH-GAINES 70MIX 18&O SEM F2

2025 bSEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER

23 players · average NTRP 3.43 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-08-19vs 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul DeMeester / Lynsey Brearley vs Kelsey Jeletz / Blaine Borchardt2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJason Meesseman / Christine Nathman-Parisi vs Kristine Deguzman / Zak Kwiecinski2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJames Gajewski / Joanne Gaines vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-05vs 4PH-DOUGLAS 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesEdin Trsic / Ana Trsic vs Lew Evenson / Emily Herbert6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEric Wheatley / Joanne Gaines vs Kevin Marvin / Kristen Houle6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDan DeLong / Lesley Discher vs Craig Schiffelbine / Margaret Bacheller6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-18vs 5PEACH-MAZUR 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEdin Trsic / Ana Trsic vs JUSTIN WHITE / Lisa Studzinski5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRamon Moore / Natalie Luke vs Brandon Fitch / Michelle Mazur2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDan DeLong / Rose Wedemeyer vs Colin O'Brien / Gigi Oleson7-5, 6-2
2025-07-11vs 6EAST-THOMAS 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul DeMeester / Christine Nathman-Parisi vs Tiffany Klaasen / Michael Held0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Palazzolo / Haley Palazzolo vs Marta Robinson / Brian Lucas7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJames Gajewski / Lynsey Brearley vs Esther Thomas / Brian Rosen3-6, 2-6
2025-06-27vs 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRamon Moore / Natalie Luke vs Nathan Kisell / Chayse Janabet3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul DeMeester / Jennifer Talbot vs Josef Provido / Jaclyn Nasir1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Wheatley / Whitney Askew vs BOB WEIDE / Luminita Varos6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-13vs 4PH-DOUGLAS 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Wheatley / Jennifer Talbot vs Lew Evenson / Emily Herbert2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJason Meesseman / Judy Hoch vs Kevin Marvin / Jen Douglas7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRose Wedemeyer / Dan DeLong vs Bruce Davies / Nancy Pfeifer4-6, 5-7
2025-06-06vs 5PEACH-MAZUR 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Won 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Belbot / Lesley Discher vs Brandon Fitch / Sheryl Eckert2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesConnor Hoch / Judy Hoch vs Stephen Nellis / Heidi Maglicic6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Wheatley / Natalie Luke vs Michael Gulas / Michelle Mazur7-5, 6-2
2025-05-30vs 6EAST-THOMAS 70MIX 18&O SEM F2Won 21
L#1 DoublesFrank Palazzolo / Haley Palazzolo vs Mike Downey / Esther Thomas4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJason Meesseman / Christine Nathman-Parisi vs Andrea Szabo / Gary Garvin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConnor Hoch / Judy Hoch vs Kwame Dildy / Fiona Baughman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2019-08-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesNatalie Luke / Ryan Buck vs Kiri Beland / James Martell6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Mazur / Jason Meesseman vs Jude Dokianos / Tom Dokianos6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2019-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesJaclyn Nasir / Jason Meesseman vs Jude Dokianos / Tom Dokianos5-7, 3-2
2019-06-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesNatalie Luke / Ryan Buck vs Kiri Beland / Eric Wheatley6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Connor Hoch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.43
Ana Trsic
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.33
Frank Palazzolo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Eric Wheatley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Joanne Gaines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Paul DeMeester
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ramon Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Lesley Discher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Talbot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Whitney Askew
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Dan DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Edin Trsic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Heidi Negri
published 3.5
2.96
Natalie Luke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Christine Nathman-Parisi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Rose Wedemeyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Judy Hoch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Haley Palazzolo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
James Gajewski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Meesseman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lynsey Brearley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Sklenar
published
William Belbot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan DeLong + Rose Wedemeyer151253% games+11.0% vs expected
Natalie Luke + Paul DeMeester0729% games+3.5% vs expected
Joanne Gaines + Eric Wheatley4444% games−2.2% vs expected
Christine Nathman-Parisi + Jason Meesseman9454% games−3.9% vs expected
Edin Trsic + Ana Trsic7947% games−10.5% vs expected
Lesley Discher + William Belbot21140% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Gaines + Jason Meesseman4549% gamesnot enough data
Eric Wheatley + Judy Hoch0527% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Hoch
106W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4
Ana Trsic
72W–108L career · 5 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Frank Palazzolo
44W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Eric Wheatley
33W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Joanne Gaines
100W–176L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Paul DeMeester
12W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ramon Moore
35W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Lesley Discher
53W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Talbot
17W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
Whitney Askew
7W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Dan DeLong
56W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Edin Trsic
82W–92L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Heidi Negri
47W–66L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Natalie Luke
83W–150L career · 5 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Christine Nathman-Parisi
63W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Rose Wedemeyer
82W–66L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Judy Hoch
62W–122L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Haley Palazzolo
5W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Gajewski
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jason Meesseman
86W–85L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynsey Brearley
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Sklenar
16W–37L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Belbot
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.