Teams

PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-21vs BLACKHAWK CC CW6.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmma Hughes / Regina Hughes vs Megan Thomas / Michelle Leiter6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Lewis / Andrea Akel vs Mary Phalon / Devonni Johnson6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Meckfessel / Nellie Hill vs Alexandra Degg / Ann Easley6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Perry / Nicole Leong vs Kelsey Kraft / Cheri Cook6-1, 6-0
2025-09-10vs BAY CLUB PL CW6.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmma Hughes / Regina Hughes vs Jazy Zhang / Flora Li6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesEmma Hughes / Regina Hughes vs Isabella Feinberg / Marilyn Scully6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaryam Amini / Caitlin Burrows vs Dana Andrew / Mary Phalon3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesFedwa Booth / Karen de Martini vs Devonni Johnson / Michele Turton7-6, 6-3
2025-08-30vs BAY CLUB PL CW6.5BLost 01
L#2 DoublesGayle Millington / KIM HOLLAND vs Julie Shi / Caimei Lei1-6, 6-7
2025-08-26vs CASTLEWOOD CC CW6.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesEmma Hughes / Regina Hughes vs Carolyn Comerford / Stella Liu3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Melanie Espejo
published
3.38
Regina Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
KIM HOLLAND
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Margaret Worden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Corri Synak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Emma Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.21
Nicole Leong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Karen de Martini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Amy Meckfessel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Andrea Akel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Regina Iwai
published
2.91
Caitlin Burrows
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Olga Keselman
published
2.83
Fedwa Booth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Nellie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Maryam Amini
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.49
Eileen Perry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Garrett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Hughes + Emma Hughes5357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Espejo
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Regina Hughes
36W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
KIM HOLLAND
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Margaret Worden
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Corri Synak
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Emma Hughes
14W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
Nicole Leong
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Karen de Martini
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Meckfessel
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Andrea Akel
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Regina Iwai
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3.5
Caitlin Burrows
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Olga Keselman
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Fedwa Booth
12W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Nellie Hill
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
Maryam Amini
8W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Eileen Perry
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Suzanne Garrett
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.