Teams

V - Libbey Park

2021 USTA Adult 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 4.5 WE

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-05vs V - Spanish Hills SpoilersLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexis Davis / Huyen Burton vs Janet Wallace / Renee Whitlock6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Howie / TRACY GUILLEN vs Ariana Prince / Ghazala Trotter7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-22vs V - LLW-SunsetHills-Ivette DunlopWon 10
W#2 DoublesHuyen Burton / Alexandra Mejia-Holdsworth vs Grace Perez / Jennifer Sherwood7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-08vs V - Spanish Hills SpoilersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexis Davis / Huyen Burton vs Lynn Severn / Nancy Caramelli6-1, 6-2
2021-05-01vs V - LLW-SunsetHills-Ivette DunlopLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Owings / TRACY GUILLEN vs Janet Klebesadel / Grace Perez7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-18vs V - Spanish Hills SpoilersWon 10
W#1 DoublesHuyen Burton / Alexis Davis vs Kathryn Fiscalini / Lynn Severn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-10vs V - LLW-SunsetHills-Ivette DunlopWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Owings / TRACY GUILLEN vs Jennifer Sherwood / Kristina McKee6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Sarah Owings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Angela McCampbell
published 4.5
4.19
Huyen Burton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
TRACY GUILLEN
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Monica Kunz
published
3.92
Mary Beth Bowles
published
3.80
Nancy Garrison
published
Christy Foreman
published
Katy Bazylewicz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TRACY GUILLEN + Sarah Owings622460% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah Owings
126W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Angela McCampbell
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Huyen Burton
108W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
TRACY GUILLEN
104W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19
Monica Kunz
13W–12L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.92
Mary Beth Bowles
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.92
Nancy Garrison
31W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Christy Foreman
27W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Katy Bazylewicz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.