Teams

V - Spanish Hills Spoilers

2021 USTA Adult 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 4.5 WE

7 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-05vs V - Libbey ParkWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Wallace / Renee Whitlock vs Alexis Davis / Huyen Burton7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAriana Prince / Ghazala Trotter vs Amanda Howie / TRACY GUILLEN6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-15vs V - LLW-SunsetHills-Ivette DunlopLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee Whitlock / Erika Tidd vs Monica Bandy / Sandy Jacobs6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-08vs V - Libbey ParkLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Severn / Nancy Caramelli vs Alexis Davis / Huyen Burton1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRenee Whitlock vs Monica Kunz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Barton / Ghazala Trotter vs Patricia Durham / Barbara OToole4-6, 6-7
2021-04-25vs V - LLW-SunsetHills-Ivette DunlopLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee Whitlock / Kathryn Fiscalini vs Monica Bandy / Sandy Jacobs3-6, 3-6
2021-04-18vs V - Libbey ParkLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Fiscalini / Lynn Severn vs Huyen Burton / Alexis Davis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-03vs V - LLW-SunsetHills-Ivette DunlopSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Fiscalini / Lynn Severn vs Grace Perez / Janet Klebesadel5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRenee Whitlock vs Jennifer Sherwood6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Janet Wallace
published
4.14
Thea Lasky
published 4.5
4.10
Renee Whitlock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Nancy Caramelli
published
3.92
Lynn Severn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Erika Tidd
published 4
3.51
Ghazala Trotter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Severn + Renee Whitlock11138% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Severn + Ghazala Trotter0635% gamesnot enough data
Ghazala Trotter + Thea Lasky044 matchesnot enough data
Ghazala Trotter + Renee Whitlock134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Wallace
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Thea Lasky
57W–97L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Renee Whitlock
107W–138L career · 8 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
4.10
Nancy Caramelli
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Lynn Severn
77W–145L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Erika Tidd
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Ghazala Trotter
188W–183L career · 6 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.