Teams

V - LLW-SunsetHills-Ivette Dunlop

2021 USTA Adult 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 4.5 WE

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-22vs V - Libbey ParkWon 10
W#1 DoublesIvette Dunlop / Janet Klebesadel vs Emily Ineman / Mary Beth Bowles7-5, 7-6
2021-05-15vs V - Spanish Hills SpoilersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica Bandy / Sandy Jacobs vs Renee Whitlock / Erika Tidd4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-01vs V - Libbey ParkWon 10
W#2 DoublesIvette Dunlop / Kimberly Stevens vs Amanda Howie / Mary Beth Bowles2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-25vs V - Spanish Hills SpoilersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica Bandy / Sandy Jacobs vs Renee Whitlock / Kathryn Fiscalini6-3, 6-3
2021-04-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIvette Dunlop / Tricia Stanley vs Barbara OToole / Alexandra Mejia-Holdsworth7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2021-04-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesMia de Leon / Ivette Dunlop vs Monique Cordray / Terri Barton7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Ivette Dunlop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Monica Bandy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Grace Perez
published 4.5
4.09
Kristina McKee
published
4.02
Jennifer Sherwood
published
3.69
Mia de Leon
published
Susan Dahlberg
published
Tricia Stanley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Bandy + Ivette Dunlop21959% games+4.9% vs expected
Grace Perez + Jennifer Sherwood2438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ivette Dunlop
130W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
Monica Bandy
75W–72L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Grace Perez
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.11
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
Jennifer Sherwood
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
4.02
Mia de Leon
19W–22L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Susan Dahlberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tricia Stanley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.