Teams

DTC NAVY

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs VC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesElaina Grauer / Stephanie Martins vs Lindsay Needler-Turner / Stephanie McCoy4-6, 5-7
2024-04-26vs EM BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKrista Yamamoto / Elaina Grauer vs Stephanie Davy / Judy Leuteneker6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelli Barton / Evelyn Price vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-20vs HFII YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatasha Gallaway / Krista Yamamoto vs Melissa Owens / Marissa Murray0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEvelyn Price / Kelli Barton vs Michelle Johnson / Elizabeth Gotto3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-14vs SKY REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesElaina Grauer / Krista Yamamoto vs Sara Visser / Amy Crockett6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatasha Gallaway / Elizabeth Sipes vs Erin Mann / Emily Brown6-1, 6-4
2024-04-13vs WP-O GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatasha Gallaway / Elizabeth Sipes vs Sara Singh / Claire Jimenez6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Stephanie Martins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Krista Yamamoto
published
3.19
Elaina Grauer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Natasha Gallaway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Kelli Barton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Evelyn Price
published
2.98
Elizabeth Sipes
published
Elisabeth Vezzani
published
Jennifer Monks
published
Robyn Tolva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaina Grauer + Stephanie Martins4161% games+7.9% vs expected
Kelli Barton + Evelyn Price12362% games+1.9% vs expected
Elaina Grauer + Natasha Gallaway303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephanie Martins
115W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Krista Yamamoto
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Elaina Grauer
143W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Natasha Gallaway
82W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
3
Kelli Barton
62W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
Evelyn Price
20W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Elizabeth Sipes
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Elisabeth Vezzani
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Monks
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robyn Tolva
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.