Teams

VC RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs DTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Kane / Annie Cordova vs Robyn Tolva / Jennifer Monks0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMerrell Aspin vs Elisabeth Vezzani1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Needler-Turner / Stephanie McCoy vs Elaina Grauer / Stephanie Martins6-4, 7-5
2024-04-21vs WP-O GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Patton / Megan Kane vs Claire Jimenez / Sara Singh6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLindsay Needler-Turner vs Lindsay Rieland6-2, 6-2
2024-04-13vs SKY REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Kane / Kate Patton vs Jennifer Fitzgerald / Sara Visser6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLindsay Needler-Turner vs Emily Brown3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Erin Mann / Jennifer Pearson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-06vs HFII YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaya Pingle Trinen / Merrell Aspin vs Michelle Johnson / Elizabeth Gotto2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKate Patton / Stephanie McCoy vs Dana McHale / Gretchen Garrison6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-30vs EM BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Patton / Merrell Aspin vs Jennifer Grumann / Stephanie Davy1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Lindsay Needler-Turner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.79
Stephanie McCoy
published
2.75
Anna Steele
published 3
2.73
Merrell Aspin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Annie Cordova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
published
2.44
Kate Patton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie McCoy + Merrell Aspin3445% games+2.5% vs expected
Merrell Aspin + Kate Patton2539% games+0.4% vs expected
Stephanie McCoy + Lindsay Needler-Turner6553% games−0.8% vs expected
Annie Cordova + Anna Steele3449% games−3.0% vs expected
Annie Cordova + Kate Patton31042% games−4.0% vs expected
Stephanie McCoy + Anna Steele134 matchesnot enough data
Annie Cordova + Merrell Aspin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lindsay Needler-Turner
104W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Stephanie McCoy
20W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Anna Steele
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Merrell Aspin
78W–93L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Annie Cordova
40W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
Maya Pingle Trinen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Kate Patton
72W–120L career · 4 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.