Teams

SKY RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-04vs EM BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Pearson / Sara Visser vs Stephanie Davy / Liz May4-6, 1-6
2024-04-27vs HFII YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Visser / Jennifer Pearson vs Sarah Turner / Marissa Murray3-6, 4-6
2024-04-14vs DTC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Visser / Amy Crockett vs Elaina Grauer / Krista Yamamoto0-6, 1-6
2024-04-13vs VC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Fitzgerald / Sara Visser vs Megan Kane / Kate Patton7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Ginger Merry
published
2.85
Sara Visser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Jennifer Fitzgerald
published
2.81
Amy Crockett
published 3
2.63
Erin Mann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Mann + Amy Crockett4352% games−4.4% vs expected
Erin Mann + Jennifer Fitzgerald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Merry
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Sara Visser
65W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Jennifer Fitzgerald
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Amy Crockett
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Erin Mann
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.