Teams

A.Cantando 40+

2023 Cap Adult NCTA 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-13vs J.KomesLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Harris / Abigail Douek vs Kristen Duke / Jenny Komes1-0
2023-05-06vs A.McNeillWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbigail Douek / Kathleen Lalor vs Diane Bosnjak King / Angie McNeill6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Erica Oliver vs Susan Potter / Grace Poole6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Cantando / Caroline Ives vs Darsan Russo / Ashley Stephenson6-4, 6-1
2023-04-29vs J.BossertWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Cantando / Kelly Hurter vs Jane Bossert / Jessica Tyndall3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-15vs C.NelsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAbigail Douek / Debi Booker vs Dee Ann Cooper / Dawn Morriston1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErica Oliver / Kelly Hurter vs Jennifer Lasater / Jill Lewis6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-25vs F.HARRISSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Cantando / Abigail Douek vs Elisabeth Nixon / Jill Wolborsky6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Hurter / Jocelyn Shaw vs Amanda Shelton / Casey Novak6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-18vs K.WahleLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Ives / Erica Oliver vs Christine Brandt / Karen Blume3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-04vs L.Edmondson 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesDebi Booker / Abigail Douek vs Beth Shelly / Christy van Ness6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Cantando / Caroline Ives vs Suzy Blackwell / Lea Edmondson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Abigail Douek
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.78
Jocelyn Shaw
published
2.62
Kelly Hurter
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.49
Caroline Ives
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.23
Debi Booker
published 2.5
Rebecca Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Ives + Kelly Hurter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Abigail Douek
80W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Jocelyn Shaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
2.5
Kelly Hurter
53W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%21%79%
2.62
3
Caroline Ives
23W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Debi Booker
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.23
Rebecca Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.