Teams

J.Bossert

2023 Cap Adult NCTA 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-13vs K.LevineLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Tyndall / AMY KOCH vs Laura Stanziale / Beth Farrell2-6, 1-6
2023-04-29vs A.Cantando 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Allison Dugan vs Rebecca Harris / Jocelyn Shaw7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJane Bossert / Jessica Tyndall vs Amy Cantando / Kelly Hurter6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-23vs A.McNeillLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Bossert / Corinna Proctor vs Angie McNeill / Darsan Russo3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Brantley / Jessica Tyndall vs Lauren Hampton / Ashley Stephenson0-6, 0-6
2023-04-15vs J.KomesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAMY KOCH / Corinna Proctor vs Kristen Duke / Brandi Washington7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Barham / Jessica Tyndall vs Zsuzsa Wahlen / Kathan Griscik2-6, 3-6
2023-03-11vs F.HARRISLost 02
L#1 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Margaret Barham vs Elisabeth Nixon / Beth Gildea1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Deborah Brantley vs Cathy Marion / Catherine Wilborne0-6, 0-6
2023-03-04vs K.WahleLost 02
L#2 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Carol Kline vs Shannon Sikes / Mary McCulley6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Bonistalli / Jessica Tyndall vs Janet Richeson / Julendia Gaillard1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Corinna Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
AMY KOCH
published 3
2.62
Jessica Tyndall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.58
Allison Dugan
published 3
2.45
Margaret Barham
published
2.30
Jane Bossert
published
2.07
Rachel Bonistalli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Dugan + Margaret Barham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Corinna Proctor
74W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
AMY KOCH
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
47W–70L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%20%80%
2.62
3
Allison Dugan
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
Margaret Barham
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%64%36%
2.45
Jane Bossert
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.30
Rachel Bonistalli
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.