← Teams

K.Levine

2023 Cap Adult NCTA 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-13vs J.BossertWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Ellina Max vs Jane Bossert / Margaret Barham6-3, 6-2
2023-05-06vs A.BakerWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesJessica Williams / Ellina Max vs Cara Garrett / Catherine Gurley6-4, 6-1
2023-05-06vs F.HARRISWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesBeth Farrell / Krystal Glover vs Jill Wolborsky / Amanda Shelton6-1, 6-2
2023-04-29Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKelly Thompson / Ellina Max vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-11vs K.WahleWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Krystal Glover vs Christine Brandt / Mary McCulley6-2, 7-6
2023-04-02vs K.PatchLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Laurie Holderness vs Sally Highsmith / Jenny Branch1-6, 5-7
2023-04-01vs J.KomesWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesBeth Farrell / Laurie Holderness vs Christine Harris / Valerie Clowes6-2, 6-1
2023-03-29vs L.Edmondson 40Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKrystal Glover / Ellina Max vs Lea Edmondson / Suzy Blackwell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-04vs M.NowickiWon 2–0
W#2 DoublesJessica Williams / Ellina Max vs Catherine Langlois / Michele Gan6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Farrell / Laurie Holderness vs Teri Wallace / Sonia Allen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kristen Levine
published —
2.84
Beth Farrell
published 3
2.62
Laurie Holderness
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Ellina Max
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Wendy Teeter
published —
2.46
Krystal Glover
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.10
Connie Dimitroff
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellina Max + Krystal Glover7–355% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Holderness + Krystal Glover1–34 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Kristen Levine
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3
Beth Farrell
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Laurie Holderness
79W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Ellina Max
59W–61L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
—
Wendy Teeter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Krystal Glover
36W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Connie Dimitroff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.