Teams

L.Edmondson 40

2023 Cap Adult NCTA 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-13vs A.BakerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristy van Ness / Sharon McCloud vs Beth Pegram / Cara Garrett6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sagal Solomon / Carolyn Wieber vs Erin Bailey / Shannon Vinson4-6, 4-6
2023-05-06vs C.NelsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Sagal Solomon / Carolyn Wieber vs Jennifer Edmunds / Gloria Koller6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuzy Blackwell / Christy van Ness vs Katie Landi / Dawn Morriston6-2, 6-0
2023-04-29vs F.HARRISWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Wieber / Suzy Blackwell vs Amanda Shelton / Catherine Wilborne6-0, 6-2
2023-04-15vs K.PatchWon 20
W#2 DoublesCorinne Alavi / Carolyn Wieber vs Kristen Patch / Sheri Erhart7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristy van Ness / Laura Yates vs Holly Austin / Maeve Gardner4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-03-29vs K.LevineLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sagal Solomon / Carolyn Wieber vs Laura Stanziale / Beth Farrell3-6, 3-6
2023-03-25vs J.KomesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCorinne Alavi / Carolyn Wieber vs Kristen Duke / Melanie Leach6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzy Blackwell / Christy van Ness vs Kathan Griscik / Zsuzsa Wahlen6-3, 6-4
2023-03-11vs M.NowickiLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy van Ness / Mindy Hamlin vs Crystal Beard / Marilyn Gordian2-6, 3-6
2023-03-04vs A.Cantando 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Shelly / Christy van Ness vs Debi Booker / Abigail Douek3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
2.52
Sharon McCloud
published
2.50
Lea Edmondson
published
2.42
Amanda Meyer
published 2.5
2.39
Carolyn Wieber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Christy van Ness
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Corinne Alavi
published 2.5
2.05
Laura Yates
published
2.00
Mindy Hamlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Wieber + Christy van Ness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Sagal Solomon
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.59
Sharon McCloud
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lea Edmondson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.50
2.5
Amanda Meyer
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Carolyn Wieber
84W–108L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Christy van Ness
73W–119L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Corinne Alavi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.26
Laura Yates
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Mindy Hamlin
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.