Teams

CBeaird

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-17vs JKomesLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Beaird / Kristin Esham vs Rachel Sanders / Alison Sinclair7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Blair Kennedy vs Jenny Komes / Valerie Clowes3-6, 2-6
2022-05-09vs CGarrettWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Beaird / Leigh Stallings vs Olga Ryzhikova / Erin Bailey6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesManjula Nagaraja / Jackie Morse vs Amanda Zukowski / Catherine Gurley6-1, 6-2
2022-05-02vs MParisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Beaird / Kristin Esham vs Traci Kornegay / April Taylor5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCaroline Braswell / Jackie Morse vs Christina LeLiever / Ihrie Wood6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-25vs BWashingtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Jackie Morse vs Kacey Barcliff / Lori Christian6-3, 6-3
2022-04-04vs GMarquezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaroline Beaird / Kristin Esham vs Jennifer Bent / Sherelle Lennon6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJackie Morse vs Sarah Griggs3-6, 4-6
2022-03-21vs BShaltLost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Leigh Stallings vs Alison Kalinowski - (DQ) / Sara Mazurak2-6, 2-6
2022-03-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesKristin Esham vs Julie Helmuth6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Emily Slater
published 3.5
2.99
Kristin Esham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
2.68
Leigh Stallings
published
2.66
Claudia Cadet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Melanie Gill
published
2.55
Caroline Beaird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Jackie Morse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.42
Jenna Cobb
published
Manjula Nagaraja
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Beaird + Jackie Morse3255% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Beaird + Kristin Esham224 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Cadet + Jackie Morse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Slater
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
3
Kristin Esham
89W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Caroline Braswell
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Leigh Stallings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Claudia Cadet
38W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Melanie Gill
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Caroline Beaird
46W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Jackie Morse
27W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Jenna Cobb
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%73%27%
2.42
Manjula Nagaraja
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.