Teams

MParis

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-17vs LYatesWon 10
W#1 DoublesApril Taylor / Traci Kornegay vs Yvette DeSilva / Sarah Winstead7-5, 6-4
2022-05-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Badham / Ihrie Wood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMeghan Paris vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-02vs CBeairdWon 10
W#1 DoublesTraci Kornegay / April Taylor vs Caroline Beaird / Kristin Esham7-5, 7-5
2022-04-30vs JCollinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Badham / Christina LeLiever vs Vickie Gibbs / Ashley Grantham6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMeghan Paris vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-04vs JKomesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Paris / MA Allen vs Jenny Komes / Rachel Sanders6-3, 6-1
2022-03-28vs CGarrettWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeghan Paris / Traci Kornegay vs Laura Edgerton / Jeanne Cashman6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennifer Badham vs Shauna Alexander6-0, 6-0
2022-03-14vs BWashingtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Paris / Jennifer Badham vs Lori Christian / Janell Cabral6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jennifer Badham
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.08
Meghan Paris
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.04
Ihrie Wood
published 3.5
3.02
April Taylor
published 3
3.01
MA Allen
published
2.95
Sarah Newton
published
2.93
Traci Kornegay
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.31
Hollan Young
published 2.5
2.17
Stephanie Sneeden
published
2.10
Jenny Branch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Paris + Jennifer Badham2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Badham
88W–15L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Meghan Paris
85W–62L career · 9 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Ihrie Wood
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
April Taylor
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
MA Allen
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
Sarah Newton
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Traci Kornegay
37W–15L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Christina LeLiever
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Hollan Young
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31
Stephanie Sneeden
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17
Jenny Branch
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.