Teams

BWashington

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-09vs LYatesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKacey Barcliff vs Corinne Alavi4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Krzeszewski / Janell Cabral vs Eva Stancil / Yvette DeSilva7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-02Split 11
W#1 DoublesBrandi Washington / Lori Christian vs Jess Pickering / Himali Patel6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKacey Barcliff vs Sarah Griggs1-6, 0-6
2022-04-27vs BShaltLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanell Cabral / Lori Krzeszewski vs Sarah Lukz / Michele Lagerstedt4-6, 0-6
2022-04-25vs CBeairdLost 12
L#1 DoublesKacey Barcliff / Lori Christian vs Claudia Cadet / Jackie Morse3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrandi Washington vs Manjula Nagaraja4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLori Krzeszewski / Janell Cabral vs Caroline Braswell / Tracy Lathan7-5, 6-3
2022-04-04vs JCollinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Krzeszewski / Janell Cabral vs Kristine Potter / Susie Albion7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrandi Washington / Kacey Barcliff vs Gabriela Flores / Vickie Gibbs6-1, 6-3
2022-03-28vs JKomesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLori Krzeszewski vs Jeannette Brown3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Christian / Kacey Barcliff vs Melanie Leach / Kathan Griscik7-6, 7-6
2022-03-21vs CGarrettWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandi Washington / Kacey Barcliff vs Leah Beatty / Catherine Gurley6-2, 6-1
2022-03-14vs MParisLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori Krzeszewski / Kacey Barcliff vs Sarah Wood / Sarah Newton6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
QUEEN HARGROVE
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Lori Krzeszewski
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.35
Brandi Washington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 2.5
2.28
Lori Christian
published
2.04
Carol Ann Mcmillan
published 2.5
1.98
Kacey Barcliff
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Melissa Hunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandi Washington + Lori Krzeszewski3542% gamesnot enough data
Brandi Washington + Kacey Barcliff213 matchesnot enough data
Kacey Barcliff + Carol Ann Mcmillan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
QUEEN HARGROVE
107W–205L career · 18 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Lori Krzeszewski
35W–69L career · 11 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.40
2.5
Brandi Washington
63W–111L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
Lori Christian
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Carol Ann Mcmillan
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Kacey Barcliff
41W–105L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Melissa Hunter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.