Teams

BP RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs NJ PINKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMargarite Parker / Katie Todd vs Suzette Emerson / Rachel Adams6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Nora Tucker6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJean Denious / Arlene Maiava vs Julie Steven / Becky Nemec3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Gallo / Judith Law vs Sarah Weill / Katie Clymer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-09vs RHCC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMelissa Richmond / Margarite Parker vs Kathryn Kurtz / Heidi Wendling6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Katie Wither3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Gallo / Arlene Maiava vs Kirstin McConnell / Bryn Marsh2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Todd / Christin Wingo vs Julia McVey / Sandra Michel3-6, 0-4
2026-07-02vs NJ GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargarite Parker / Melissa Richmond vs Kathy Peterson / Wanda Shepherd2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Gallo / Judith Law vs Helen Hock / Susan Lenny1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Nakano / Christin Wingo vs Diane Waldron / Nancy Stapp4-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs LTC-D REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKatie Todd / Judith Law vs Shana Fonte / Jennifer Phillips2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Joan Clancy1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargarite Parker / Susan Nakano vs Martha McNamara / April Kobayashi6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJean Denious / Arlene Maiava vs Lauren Gardiner / Jennifer Rogers6-2, 6-4
2026-06-18vs MC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesKatie Todd / Judith Law vs Patricia Demers / Kristin Mazzarese3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Patricia Billinger6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Nakano / Arlene Maiava vs Mai Lee / Natalie Sanso6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Richmond / Jean Denious vs Ana Bland / Bobbi Dorgan7-6, 6-4
2026-06-11vs LTC-M GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMargarite Parker / Melissa Richmond vs Molly Beach / Ursula Hamel6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Molly Balmes1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Todd / Susan Nakano vs Julie Gall / Lauren Cilli3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Gallo / Arlene Maiava vs Margaret Kuhn / Erika Vincent7-6, 6-2
2026-06-04vs HIW REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMargarite Parker / Melissa Richmond vs Danielle Rooney / Nicole Reyes6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Nora Alby2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Gallo / Judith Law vs Mieke Scripps / Hilary Murphy1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Todd / Susan Nakano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Margarite Parker
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.33
Jessica Pierce
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Melissa Richmond
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Jean Denious
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Arlene Maiava
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Christin Wingo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Natalie Brader
published
3.03
Susan Gallo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Susan Nakano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Judith Law
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Katie Todd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Richmond + Margarite Parker10166% games+10.9% vs expected
Judith Law + Susan Gallo11938% games−5.2% vs expected
Judith Law + Melissa Richmond314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margarite Parker
52W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jessica Pierce
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Melissa Richmond
30W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Jean Denious
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Arlene Maiava
5W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Christin Wingo
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Natalie Brader
7W–18L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Susan Gallo
13W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Susan Nakano
56W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Judith Law
16W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Katie Todd
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.