Teams

MC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs LTC-D REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesClaudia Perales / Karen Boisnard vs Shana Fonte / Jennifer Phillips5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJackie Kunzler vs Joan Clancy3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMai Lee / Natalie Sanso vs Lauren Gardiner / Leigh Goerke6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBobbi Dorgan / Patricia Billinger vs Linda Sexton / April Kobayashi1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-09vs LTC-M GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesPamela Catalano / Patricia Demers vs Molly Balmes / Margaret Kuhn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Mazzarese vs Amy Coddington6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Billinger / Bobbi Dorgan vs Molly Beach / Ursula Hamel3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Claudia Perales vs Barbara Nevins / Lauren Cilli6-2, 6-1
2026-07-02vs NJ PINKLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Catalano / Karen Boisnard vs Mollie Toth / Suzette Emerson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBobbi Dorgan / Claudia Perales vs Sarah Weill / Julie Steven3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Kristin Mazzarese vs Julie Brown / Nora Tucker6-4, 6-2
2026-06-25vs NJ GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Boisnard / Patricia Demers vs MIchelle Aurzada / Susan Lenny6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Mazzarese vs Natalie Schaefer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMai Lee / Natalie Sanso vs Wanda Shepherd / Kathy Peterson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Claudia Perales vs Becky Myers / Nancy Stapp6-3, 6-1
2026-06-18vs BP REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesPatricia Demers / Kristin Mazzarese vs Katie Todd / Judith Law6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesPatricia Billinger vs Jessica Pierce1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMai Lee / Natalie Sanso vs Susan Nakano / Arlene Maiava4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAna Bland / Bobbi Dorgan vs Melissa Richmond / Jean Denious6-7, 4-6
2026-06-11vs HIW REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBobbi Dorgan / Claudia Perales vs Nora Alby / Danielle Rooney0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesPamela Catalano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRoberta Barolat / Karen Boisnard vs Lindsey Strickler / Mieke Scripps6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Mazzarese / Jackie Kunzler vs Hilary Murphy / Amy Long7-5, 7-5
2026-06-04vs RHCC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesPatricia Demers / Natalie Sanso vs Susan Weese / Sue Gallagher6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesPatricia Billinger vs Madeleine Futterman2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Perales / Pamela Catalano vs Valerie VanAlsburg / Sandra Michel4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoberta Barolat / Ana Bland vs Kathryn Kurtz / Bryn Marsh3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Patricia Demers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Patricia Billinger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Roberta Barolat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Bobbi Dorgan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Kristin Mazzarese
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
3.11
Karen Boisnard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Natalie Sanso
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Jackie Kunzler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Ana Bland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Catalano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Mai Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Claudia Perales
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Barolat + Karen Boisnard3556% games+9.0% vs expected
Ana Bland + Claudia Perales2449% games+7.9% vs expected
Ana Bland + Natalie Sanso12951% games+5.3% vs expected
Karen Boisnard + Pamela Catalano3349% games−0.6% vs expected
Pamela Catalano + Patricia Demers4348% games−3.3% vs expected
Mai Lee + Natalie Sanso142046% games−4.6% vs expected
Ana Bland + Karen Boisnard2349% games−5.6% vs expected
Ana Bland + Pamela Catalano51244% games−9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Patricia Demers
94W–92L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Patricia Billinger
68W–91L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Roberta Barolat
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Bobbi Dorgan
37W–76L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Kristin Mazzarese
65W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
3.5
Karen Boisnard
79W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Natalie Sanso
50W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jackie Kunzler
36W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Ana Bland
87W–109L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Pamela Catalano
63W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Mai Lee
27W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Claudia Perales
22W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.