Teams

NJ PINK

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs BP REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSuzette Emerson / Rachel Adams vs Margarite Parker / Katie Todd3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNora Tucker vs Jessica Pierce3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Steven / Becky Nemec vs Jean Denious / Arlene Maiava3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Weill / Katie Clymer vs Susan Gallo / Judith Law2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-09vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Adams / Sarah Weill vs MIchelle Aurzada / Susan Lenny3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMollie Toth / Becky Nemec vs Helen Hock / Kathy Peterson6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBrooke Rinehart / Joanne Jonathan vs Diane Waldron / Nancy Stapp4-6, 3-6
2026-07-02vs MC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMollie Toth / Suzette Emerson vs Pamela Catalano / Karen Boisnard3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Weill / Julie Steven vs Bobbi Dorgan / Claudia Perales6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Brown / Nora Tucker vs Ana Bland / Kristin Mazzarese4-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs HIW REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesRachel Adams / Mollie Toth vs Nicole Reyes / Lindsey Strickler0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBecky Nemec vs Nora Alby2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLynne Buhlig / Sarah Weill vs Jill Bader / Mieke Scripps6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Rinehart / Katie Clymer vs Deirdre Brigham / Reid Thompson2-6, 2-6
2026-06-18vs RHCC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMollie Toth / Suzette Emerson vs Kirstin McConnell / Sandra Michel6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Weill vs Katie Weiman1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Nemec / Julie Brown vs Bryn Marsh / Heidi Wendling0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNora Tucker / Joanne Jonathan vs Mindi Pearse / Madeleine Futterman6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-11vs LTC-D REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Weill / Julie Steven vs Shana Fonte / Jennifer Phillips4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLynne Buhlig vs Leigh Goerke4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMollie Toth / Katie Clymer vs Linda Sexton / Vera Aaron6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNora Tucker / Brooke Rinehart vs Lauren Gardiner / April Kobayashi5-7, 2-6
2026-06-04vs LTC-M GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Weill / Julie Steven vs Ursula Hamel / Molly Beach6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNora Tucker / Lynne Buhlig vs Julie Gall / Lauren Cilli3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Clymer / Brooke Rinehart vs Amy Coddington / Margaret Kuhn1-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Becky Nemec
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Suzette Emerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Lynne Buhlig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Mollie Toth
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.19
Rachel Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Julie Steven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Katie Clymer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Joanne Jonathan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Brooke Rinehart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Sarah Weill
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.86
Nora Tucker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mollie Toth + Becky Nemec5066% games+12.9% vs expected
Sarah Weill + Julie Steven5254% games+6.7% vs expected
Mollie Toth + Rachel Adams224 matchesnot enough data
Becky Nemec + Rachel Adams314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Weill + Becky Nemec123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Clymer + Brooke Rinehart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Nemec
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Suzette Emerson
105W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Lynne Buhlig
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Mollie Toth
149W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
Rachel Adams
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Julie Steven
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Katie Clymer
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Joanne Jonathan
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brooke Rinehart
1W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Sarah Weill
140W–91L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Nora Tucker
21W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.