Teams

LCTA55/WHITE/MPR

2022 STA 55 & Over Combo Doubles · 55 & over Combo - Women 6.5 Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-09-28vs LCTA55/Frankel/Dunes WestSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMARY HOLTZ / Carol Welsman vs Holly Mummert / Kim Frankel6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeverly Mckinley / Cathy Cocolas vs Anne Underkofler / Barbara Breidenbruch2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & over Combo - Women 6.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kari Roever
published
3.32
Amy Jarck
published 3.5
3.27
MARY HOLTZ
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Sylvia Delsalto
published
3.17
Rebecca Adler
published
3.00
Tracy Cassaday
published
2.97
Beverly Mckinley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Caryn Lyons
published 3.5
2.85
2.79
Patricia Dever
published
Daniela Hoag
published 3
2.73
Robin White
published
2.68
Cindy Newman
published 3
Linda Neyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvia Delsalto + Rebecca Adler15359% games+8.8% vs expected
Amy Jarck + MARY HOLTZ121154% games+2.5% vs expected
Tracy Cassaday + Patricia Dever0634% gamesnot enough data
Amy Jarck + Robin White314 matchesnot enough data
Robin White + MARY HOLTZ224 matchesnot enough data
Robin White + Sylvia Delsalto314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Jarck + Beverly Mckinley213 matchesnot enough data
Beverly Mckinley + Rebecca Adler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kari Roever
43W–43L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Amy Jarck
65W–58L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
MARY HOLTZ
60W–51L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Sylvia Delsalto
88W–72L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Rebecca Adler
51W–42L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
Tracy Cassaday
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Beverly Mckinley
30W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
3.5
Caryn Lyons
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Jacqueline Jarnagin
32W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Patricia Dever
39W–62L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Daniela Hoag
40W–36L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin White
56W–60L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cindy Newman
31W–40L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Linda Neyle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.