Teams

JBarker

2022 Cap Spring NCTA 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 women

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatie Cunningham / Caroline Braswell vs Melissa Proctor / Lisa Boneham6-3, 6-4
2022-04-30vs PMabungaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAbbie Williamson / Kathryn Shields vs Paula Mabunga / Janet Murphy6-2, 6-3
2022-04-23vs CLangloisWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatie Cunningham / Caroline Braswell vs Michele Nowicki / Marilyn Gordian6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNina Schweitzer / Caroline Beaird vs Catherine Langlois / Mary Lewis James6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-02vs LEdgertonWon 10
W#1 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Meta Bartley vs Anne Baker / Shannon Vinson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-19vs KGilreath 40+ 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Shields / Meta Bartley vs Kristi Gilreath / Eliza Bobryshev6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatie Cunningham / Caroline Beaird vs Lanier McRee / Randi Wolk7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Nina Schweitzer vs Yvonne Howell / Kathryn West7-5, 6-4
2022-03-15vs JKomesWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathryn Shields / Courtney Grinnell vs Laura Brandt / Zsuzsa Wahlen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCaroline Braswell / Catie Cunningham vs Laura Yates / Jenny Komes6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Catie Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.84
2.80
2.77
Kathryn Shields
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Claudia Cadet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Melanie Gill
published
2.55
Caroline Beaird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Jenna Cobb
published
2.24
Nina Schweitzer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Cadet + Catie Cunningham4168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Courtney Grinnell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Caroline Braswell
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Claudia Cadet
38W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Melanie Gill
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Caroline Beaird
46W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Jenna Cobb
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%73%27%
2.42
Nina Schweitzer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.