Teams

JKomes

2022 Cap Spring NCTA 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-18Split 11
L#2 DoublesJenny Komes / Valerie Clowes vs Jaclyn Barker / Meta Bartley2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTeri Wallace / Elizabeth Pavese vs Shannon Cassell / Kathleen Lalor1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-07vs KGilreath 40+ 2.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesJenny Komes / Valerie Clowes vs Laura Kavanaugh / Molly Kuefel2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTeri Wallace / Elizabeth Pavese vs Yvonne Howell / Lanier McRee6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-30vs FHarrisLost 01
L#3 DoublesValerie Clowes / Teri Wallace vs Fran Harris / Lauren Lelewski4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-23vs SKingLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Duke / Kathan Griscik vs Samantha Pickett / Laurie Holderness1-6, 6-7
2022-04-02vs PMabungaLost 01
L#2 DoublesHazel Holland / Valerie Clowes vs Paula Mabunga / Janet Murphy1-6, 3-6
2022-03-26vs CLangloisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeannette Brown / Valerie Clowes vs Michele Nowicki / Marilyn Gordian6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Pavese / Teri Wallace vs Gail Granata / Michele Gan3-6, 4-6
2022-03-15vs JBarkerLost 01
L#3 DoublesValerie Clowes / Teri Wallace vs Melanie Gill / Nina Schweitzer6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Jeannette Brown
published
2.98
Jenny Komes
published 3
2.69
Barbara Davis
published 3
2.57
Kathan Griscik
published
2.55
Kristen Duke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Lynn Longest
published
2.38
Zsuzsa Wahlen
published
2.24
Elizabeth Pavese
published 2.5
2.13
Valerie Clowes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.12
Teri Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Laura Yates
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Wallace + Elizabeth Pavese123 matchesnot enough data
Teri Wallace + Valerie Clowes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannette Brown
14W–26L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Jenny Komes
121W–87L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Barbara Davis
23W–40L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Kathan Griscik
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%29%71%
2.57
3
Kristen Duke
115W–104L career · 1 line in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Lynn Longest
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
Zsuzsa Wahlen
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Elizabeth Pavese
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Valerie Clowes
64W–134L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Teri Wallace
22W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laura Yates
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.