Teams

KGilreath 40+ 2.5

2022 Cap Spring NCTA 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-20vs FHarrisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRossi Evans / Beth Pegram vs Michele Lagerstedt / Sara Mazurak6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLanier McRee / Kathryn West vs Lauren Lelewski / Beth Gildea2-6, 3-6
2022-05-07vs JKomesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRossi Evans / Kristi Gilreath vs Zsuzsa Wahlen / Kathan Griscik6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesYvonne Howell / Lanier McRee vs Teri Wallace / Elizabeth Pavese3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-30vs SKingLost 02
L#1 DoublesRossi Evans / Beth Pegram vs Laurie Holderness / Samantha Pickett5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKathryn West / Lanier McRee vs Beth Farrell / Kelly Thompson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesRossi Evans / Beth Pegram vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLanier McRee / Sarah Ferguson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-02vs CLangloisWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristi Gilreath / Rossi Evans vs Brandi Washington / Gail Granata6-1, 6-4
2022-03-19vs JBarkerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLanier McRee / Randi Wolk vs Catie Cunningham / Caroline Beaird5-7, 4-6
2022-03-13vs FHarrisWon 30
W#1 DoublesEliza Bobryshev / Rossi Evans vs Beth Gildea / Melanie Hewitt6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Kuefel / Lanier McRee vs Elisabeth Nixon / Lauren Lelewski5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Ferguson / Beth Pegram vs Sara Mazurak / Fran Harris6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Rossi Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Beth Pegram
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Lanier McRee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Kristi Gilreath
published
2.40
Eliza Bobryshev
published 2.5
2.27
Kathryn West
published
2.25
Randi Wolk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rossi Evans + Beth Pegram3356% gamesnot enough data
Lanier McRee + Rossi Evans5068% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Rossi Evans
142W–87L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Beth Pegram
77W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Lanier McRee
120W–98L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Kristi Gilreath
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Eliza Bobryshev
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40
Kathryn West
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
Randi Wolk
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.