Teams

SDNC 3.5 RBCTC/ Crivello (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesKiersten Bousquet vs Ann Kelter0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-07-12vs SDNC 3.5 FRCC/ Gammon (2/2)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKiersten Bousquet vs Clare Lemon3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSuzy Liu / Jennifer Bucky vs Sara Galante / Susan Gammon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzy Liu / Jamie Crivello vs Ana Trombley / Yvette Reeve5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDiane Dauphine / Maryann Breed vs Lisa Sherwood / CORRI HARVEY1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSuzy Liu / Kristin Nevin vs Joanne Reyes-Brisbin / Beth Piper6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesDiane Dauphine / Diane Morgan vs Rachel Ficara / Sarah Knoke0-6, 0-6
2021-06-07vs SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Rice (2/2)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Dauphine / Maryann Breed vs Robyn Rice / Alicia Mapes6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSuzy Liu / Jenny Dunlap vs Roberta Schrott / Christine Johnson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Amanda Barnard
published 4
3.62
April Guerieri
published 4
3.38
Jennifer Bucky
published 3.5
3.21
Stephanie Persson
published 3.5
3.14
Diane Morgan
published 3.5
3.12
Suzy Liu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.09
Kiersten Bousquet
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Diane Dauphine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Jamie Crivello
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bucky + Amanda Barnard7553% games−3.3% vs expected
Suzy Liu + Jennifer Bucky6457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Barnard
111W–53L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
April Guerieri
2W–15L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Jennifer Bucky
67W–47L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Stephanie Persson
31W–27L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Diane Morgan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Suzy Liu
47W–50L career · 10 lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Kiersten Bousquet
78W–88L career · 2 lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Diane Dauphine
28W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Jamie Crivello
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.