Teams

SDNC 3.5 La Costa Resort/ Zielinski (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-02vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ Young (2/2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Ficara / Donna Galloway vs Janice Fernando / Mie Bennett6-4, 6-1
2021-07-21vs SDNC 3.5 Winners TC/ Preti (2/2)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJessica D'Ambrosio / Heather Collins vs Elizabeth Liotta / Gracie Jones2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Ficara vs Susie Alvarez2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRachel Ficara / Sarah Knoke vs Ann Kelter / Anne Reese6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-14vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC/ Crivello (2/2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Ficara / Sarah Knoke vs Diane Dauphine / Diane Morgan6-0, 6-0
2021-06-07vs SDNC 3.5 FRCC/ Gammon (2/2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Knoke / Rachel Ficara vs Leanne Kiviharju / Beth Mattfolk2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Deanna Murphy
published 4
3.47
Rachel Ficara
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Holly Weber
published 3.5
3.38
Erin Pasqualini
published 3.5
3.36
Elizabeth Nunez
published 3.5
Dee Dee Zielinski
published 3.5
3.09
Heather Collins
published 3.5
3.05
Jessica D'Ambrosio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Heather Gonzalez
published 3
Janelle Anisso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Nunez + Holly Weber4356% games+9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deanna Murphy
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Rachel Ficara
48W–34L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Holly Weber
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Erin Pasqualini
56W–64L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Elizabeth Nunez
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Dee Dee Zielinski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Heather Collins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Jessica D'Ambrosio
61W–73L career · 1 line in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Heather Gonzalez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
Janelle Anisso
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.