Teams

SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ Young (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesJulia Simone / Bunny Shin vs Heather Collins / Karen Hamilton6-4, 6-4
2021-07-26vs SDNC 3.5 FRCC/ Gammon (2/2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBunny Shin / Julia Simone vs Darcy Karpman / Janie Munce6-1, 6-4
2021-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesBunny Shin / Julia Simone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-12vs SDNC LLW 3.5 RBCTC / NelsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesBunny Shin / Pat Greenwald vs Judy Cahan / Jennifer Lowe6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-21vs SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Rice (2/2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBunny Shin / Julia Simone vs Maeve Brick / Antonina Raccosta6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesBunny Shin / Julia Simone vs Jennifer van Riet / Kelson Splavec1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJan Biundo / Pat Greenwald vs Mary Beth Woulfe / Barbara Suk0-6, 0-6
2021-06-07vs SDNC 3.5 Winners TC/ Preti (2/2)Split 11
L#2 DoublesBunny Shin / Julia Simone vs Inge Bisconer / Mary Jo Preti2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTatiana Bourd / Pat Greenwald vs Elizabeth Liotta / Meghan Tudor6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Mie Bennett
published
2.98
Liz Perkins
published
2.90
Bunny Shin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.81
Julia Simone
published
2.72
Sabine Schroeder
published 3
2.51
Tatiana Bourd
published
2.49
Pat Greenwald
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Vicky Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabine Schroeder + Bunny Shin6550% games−4.4% vs expected
Bunny Shin + Pat Greenwald3453% gamesnot enough data
Sabine Schroeder + Liz Perkins2348% gamesnot enough data
Sabine Schroeder + Pat Greenwald0532% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Young + Liz Perkins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mie Bennett
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Liz Perkins
16W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Bunny Shin
40W–44L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
Julia Simone
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Sabine Schroeder
40W–62L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
Tatiana Bourd
0W–7L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Pat Greenwald
29W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.49
Vicky Young
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.