Teams

SDNC LLW 3.5 RBCTC / Nelson

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-02vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC/ Crivello (2/2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Gans / Judy Cahan vs Maryann Breed / April Guerieri6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNancy Samuelsen vs Diane Silberman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSumiko Nelson / Mary Ann Neder vs Debra Martelli / Jennifer van Riet6-2, 6-4
2021-07-12vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ Young (2/2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJudy Cahan / Jennifer Lowe vs Bunny Shin / Pat Greenwald4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNancy Samuelsen vs Haruko Vajda4-6, 4-6
2021-06-28vs SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Rice (2/2)Won 20
W#1 SinglesNancy Samuelsen vs Robyn Rice6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSumiko Nelson / Deborah Davies vs Gail Priest / Roberta Schrott5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-21vs SDNC 3.5 FRCC/ Gammon (2/2)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJudy Cahan / Patty Smith vs Susan Gammon / Beth Mattfolk6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Berkley Bowers
published 4
3.64
Christi McClain
published 4
3.55
Pamela Newman
published
3.25
Sumiko Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Mary Ann Neder
published
3.14
Nancy Samuelsen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Heidi Dalvie
published 3.5
3.07
Rebekah Seidel
published
3.06
Judy Cahan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jennifer Lowe
published
Patty Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sumiko Nelson + Christi McClain3252% gamesnot enough data
Sumiko Nelson + Judy Cahan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Berkley Bowers
11W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Christi McClain
111W–48L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
Pamela Newman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sumiko Nelson
54W–47L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Mary Ann Neder
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.22
3.5
Nancy Samuelsen
87W–93L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Heidi Dalvie
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Rebekah Seidel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Judy Cahan
42W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Lowe
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patty Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.