Teams

SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Rice (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesAlicia Mapes / Robyn Rice vs CORRI HARVEY / Lisa Sherwood6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-02vs SDNC 3.5 Winners TC/ Preti (2/2)Won 20
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Elena Gilmor6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Avedisian / Bobbie Manheim vs Martina Chapkis / Suzanne Concors2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Karen Hamilton7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Atkinson / Bobbie Manheim vs Julie Howard / Dee Dee Zielinski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAlicia Mapes / Robyn Rice vs Debra Martelli / Diane Silberman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Jennifer van Riet6-1, 6-2
2021-06-28vs SDNC LLW 3.5 RBCTC / NelsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesRobyn Rice vs Nancy Samuelsen1-6, 3-6
2021-06-21vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ Young (2/2)Won 20
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Katherine Lam6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobyn Rice / Christine Johnson vs Vicky Young / Janice Fernando6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAlicia Mapes / Robyn Rice vs Honor Krutsinger / Ann Kelter2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Amy Flynn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-07vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC/ Crivello (2/2)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRobyn Rice / Alicia Mapes vs Diane Dauphine / Maryann Breed7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Paula Brust6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Edna Mattei
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.28
Maeve Brick
published 3.5
3.27
Christine Johnson
published 3.5
Gail Priest
published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Atkinson
published
2.97
Bobbie Manheim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Robyn Rice
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Rice + Maeve Brick9361% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edna Mattei
45W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Maeve Brick
124W–92L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Christine Johnson
45W–30L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gail Priest
0W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Atkinson
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Bobbie Manheim
32W–65L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.97
3.5
Robyn Rice
103W–115L career · 6 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.