Teams

Older Than Dirt

2026 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-29vs 10Years10LBagoWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhil Ellis / Lon McDonald vs Andy Mehl / Mark Bell6-0, 6-1
2026-06-24vs Over Served 55Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Reed / David Koerner vs Dan Hart / Chris Culig6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-22vs The FingerWon 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Reed / Anthony Saulino vs Eduardo Vergara / Randy Carroll6-1, 6-1
2026-06-17vs SlapshotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Koerner / Jake Putnam vs Pepi Ursillo / Peter Johansen6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn Coltrin / Lon McDonald vs Bill Paseman / Brett Gallagher6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-15vs Old EnoughLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Koerner / Jim Geddings vs Bob Haycock / Jeff Huhn6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLon McDonald / Daniel Reed vs Andrew Bidou / Mark Stillman6-7, 4-6
2026-06-10vs 10Years10LBagoWon 20
W#1 DoublesDOUGLAS de BURGH / David Koerner vs Dave Gopalakrishnan / Lane Nielson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Reed / Lynn Coltrin vs Mark Bell / Alex Tatistcheff6-3, 6-4
2026-06-08vs Over Served 55Won 20
W#2 DoublesDOUGLAS de BURGH / David Koerner vs Richard Scharf / Gary Loeb6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynn Coltrin / Lon McDonald vs Gary Lim / Lee Parsons7-6, 6-4
2026-06-03vs The FingerLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Koerner / Daniel Reed vs Eduardo Vergara / Steven Buchanan6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-01vs SlapshotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Reed / Lynn Coltrin vs Jan Schiedel / Peter Johansen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Old Enough10027310177
2Over Served 5564151530263
3Older Than Dirt55171331259
4The Finger55161434274
5Slapshots46121842305
610Years10LBago01032756341

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Phil Ellis
published 3.5
3.47
Jake Putnam
published 3.5
3.41
David Koerner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Anthony Saulino
published 3.5
3.30
Daniel Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
James Elliott
published 3.5
3.27
DOUGLAS de BURGH
published 3.5
Christopher Lind
published 3.5
3.15
Lynn Coltrin
published 3.5
3.14
Jackson Cramer
published 3.5
3.11
Jim Geddings
published 3.5
Lon McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Ellis + Jake Putnam8562% games+9.9% vs expected
Lynn Coltrin + James Elliott71345% games−12.5% vs expected
DOUGLAS de BURGH + Christopher Lind241852% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + Anthony Saulino10559% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + DOUGLAS de BURGH5550% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Anthony Saulino6354% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + Christopher Lind4448% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + DOUGLAS de BURGH2545% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Phil Ellis
65W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Jake Putnam
43W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
David Koerner
13W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Anthony Saulino
112W–62L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Daniel Reed
10W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
James Elliott
95W–93L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
DOUGLAS de BURGH
72W–45L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Lind
20W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Coltrin
87W–108L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Jackson Cramer
19W–61L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Jim Geddings
18W–27L career · type S · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Lon McDonald
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.