Teams

Old Enough

2026 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Old Enough10027310177
2Over Served 5564151530263
3Older Than Dirt55171331259
4The Finger55161434274
5Slapshots46121842305
610Years10LBago01032756341

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Willie Lafrades
published 3.5
3.56
Bob Haycock
published 3.5
3.54
Andrew Bidou
published 3.5
3.50
Troy Casper
published 3.5
3.46
Tim Cowles
published 3.5
3.45
Jim Brigham
published 3.5
3.44
Jeff Huhn
published 3.5
3.39
James Mertz
published 3.5
3.39
Mark Stillman
published 3.5
3.38
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
3.37
Dit Dudley
published 3.5
3.34
John Chavez
published 3.5
3.27
Jon Hancock
published 3.5
3.23
Randy Howell
published 3.5
Roger Quarles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dit Dudley + John Chavez7359% games+7.3% vs expected
Bob Haycock + Tim Cowles5163% games+3.3% vs expected
Troy Casper + Jeff Huhn6259% games+2.9% vs expected
Randy Howell + Willie Lafrades171153% games+0.4% vs expected
John Chavez + Jim Brigham14754% games−0.0% vs expected
Bob Haycock + Jeff Huhn8357% games−0.0% vs expected
Andrew Bidou + James Mertz13461% games−2.7% vs expected
James Mertz + Jeff Huhn6749% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Willie Lafrades
112W–110L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Bob Haycock
128W–78L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Andrew Bidou
106W–61L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Troy Casper
131W–81L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Tim Cowles
124W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Jim Brigham
194W–84L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Jeff Huhn
89W–49L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
James Mertz
187W–123L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Mark Stillman
98W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Russell Moorhead
109W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Dit Dudley
159W–107L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
John Chavez
181W–102L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Jon Hancock
55W–65L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Randy Howell
61W–79L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Roger Quarles
10W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.