Teams

Woolsey

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-09vs KelleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Patterson / Brenda Chavez vs Alisa McFarden / Sherry Ollinger Scott1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDeann Morrison / Martha Schroeder vs Maria Guadalupe Kelley / Hui LI Su Wu6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAna Maria Ranone / Esmeralda Ivy vs Delphine Hittson / Nila Burgin6-0, 6-3
2026-04-02vs LeardLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Patterson / Chandra Short vs Lisa Brack / Shelby Lowe2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrenda Chavez / Mary Jane Hammond vs Christy Kocsis / Shelley Matos4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCenee Precure / Ana Maria Ranone vs Denise Leard / Robbie Ritter6-4, 4-3
2026-03-26vs HaggardWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Jill Patterson vs Misty Ford / Michelle Mayfield6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMartha Schroeder / Jennifer Woolsey vs Heather Burns / Lisa Kimbrell6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDeann Morrison / Cenee Precure vs Debbie Bonin / Janet Uptergrove6-0, 6-1
2026-03-19vs KelleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartha Schroeder / Ana Maria Ranone vs Alisa McFarden / Delphine Hittson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJill Patterson / Mary Jane Hammond vs Maria Guadalupe Kelley / Hui LI Su Wu4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEsmeralda Ivy / Jennifer Woolsey vs Denise Litherland / Sherry Ollinger Scott6-2, 6-1
2026-03-12vs LeardLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartha Schroeder / Deann Morrison vs Lisa Brack / Deborah Walterscheid1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Hammond / Brenda Chavez vs Shelley Matos / Nicki Crump3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChandra Short / Claudia Aragon vs Shelby Lowe / Christy Kocsis3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-05vs HaggardWon 30
W#1 DoublesEsmeralda Ivy / Jennifer Woolsey vs Ricee Taylor / Michelle Mayfield6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCenee Precure / Deann Morrison vs Roxanne Ledwig / Debbie Bonin6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Brenda Chavez vs Lorraine Haggard / Heather Burns6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Cenee Precure
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Martha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Esmeralda Ivy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Claudia Aragon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Chandra Short
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Jill Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Brenda Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Mary Jane Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Jennifer Woolsey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Ana Maria Ranone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Deann Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Esmeralda Ivy + Martha Schroeder224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Woolsey + Claudia Aragon033 matchesnot enough data
Martha Schroeder + Cenee Precure213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cenee Precure
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.93
Martha Schroeder
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Esmeralda Ivy
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
3.5
Claudia Aragon
12W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.62
3.5
Chandra Short
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Jill Patterson
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Brenda Chavez
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Mary Jane Hammond
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Jennifer Woolsey
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Ana Maria Ranone
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Deann Morrison
9W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.