Teams

Leard

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Ladies

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-09vs HaggardWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise Leard / Deborah Walterscheid vs Lorraine Haggard / Ricee Taylor6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLibby Ellington / Shelley Matos vs Lisa Kimbrell / Roxanne Ledwig7-5, 6-1
2026-04-02vs WoolseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Brack / Shelby Lowe vs Jill Patterson / Chandra Short6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Kocsis / Shelley Matos vs Brenda Chavez / Mary Jane Hammond6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDenise Leard / Robbie Ritter vs Cenee Precure / Ana Maria Ranone4-6, 3-4
2026-03-26vs KelleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Brack / Deborah Walterscheid vs Delphine Hittson / Nila Burgin6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristy Kocsis / Nicki Crump vs Maria Guadalupe Kelley / Sherry Ollinger Scott4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDenise Leard / Robbie Ritter vs Diane Meyers / Denise Litherland6-1, 6-3
2026-03-19vs HaggardWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Brack / Denise Leard vs Roxanne Ledwig / Michelle Mayfield6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShelley Matos / Libby Ellington vs Lisa Kimbrell / Lorraine Haggard6-3, 6-2
2026-03-12vs WoolseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Brack / Deborah Walterscheid vs Martha Schroeder / Deann Morrison6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShelley Matos / Nicki Crump vs Mary Jane Hammond / Brenda Chavez6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesShelby Lowe / Christy Kocsis vs Chandra Short / Claudia Aragon6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-05vs KelleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobbie Ritter / Nicki Crump vs Hui LI Su Wu / Michelle Smith6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShelley Matos / Christy Kocsis vs Delphine Hittson / Denise Litherland6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leard601626101
2Kelley249919143
3Haggard0601836218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Lisa Brack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Shelby Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Christy Kocsis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Deborah Walterscheid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Nicki Crump
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Robbie Ritter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Denise Leard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Shelley Matos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Libby Ellington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Brack + Deborah Walterscheid5070% games+8.3% vs expected
Robbie Ritter + Shelley Matos033 matchesnot enough data
Robbie Ritter + Nicki Crump213 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Matos + Libby Ellington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Brack
28W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.64
Shelby Lowe
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Christy Kocsis
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Deborah Walterscheid
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Nicki Crump
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Robbie Ritter
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Denise Leard
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Shelley Matos
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Libby Ellington
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.