Teams

Haggard

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Ladies

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-09vs LeardLost 02
L#1 DoublesLorraine Haggard / Ricee Taylor vs Denise Leard / Deborah Walterscheid3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Kimbrell / Roxanne Ledwig vs Libby Ellington / Shelley Matos5-7, 1-6
2026-04-02vs KelleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRicee Taylor / Lorraine Haggard vs Alisa McFarden / Denise Litherland2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Kimbrell / Michelle Mayfield vs Sherry Ollinger Scott / Michelle Smith7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-26vs WoolseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMisty Ford / Michelle Mayfield vs Claudia Aragon / Jill Patterson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Burns / Lisa Kimbrell vs Martha Schroeder / Jennifer Woolsey1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Bonin / Janet Uptergrove vs Deann Morrison / Cenee Precure0-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs LeardLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoxanne Ledwig / Michelle Mayfield vs Lisa Brack / Denise Leard1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Kimbrell / Lorraine Haggard vs Shelley Matos / Libby Ellington3-6, 2-6
2026-03-12vs KelleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoxanne Ledwig / Michelle Mayfield vs Denise Litherland / Alisa McFarden0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Bonin / Lorraine Haggard vs Hui LI Su Wu / Sherry Ollinger Scott1-6, 1-6
2026-03-05vs WoolseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesRicee Taylor / Michelle Mayfield vs Esmeralda Ivy / Jennifer Woolsey1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Ledwig / Debbie Bonin vs Cenee Precure / Deann Morrison0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLorraine Haggard / Heather Burns vs Claudia Aragon / Brenda Chavez4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leard601626101
2Kelley249919143
3Haggard0601836218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lisa Kimbrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Janet Uptergrove
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Lorraine Haggard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Michelle Mayfield
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.70
Debbie Bonin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Roxanne Ledwig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Misty Ford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ricee Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Kimbrell
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Janet Uptergrove
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Lorraine Haggard
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Michelle Mayfield
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Debbie Bonin
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Roxanne Ledwig
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Misty Ford
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ricee Taylor
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.