Teams

Canyon Creek/Obert W3.5

2023 DTA N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

23 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Mollie Romness
published
3.77
Tara Cormier-Reeder
published
3.72
Kimberly Bates
published
3.63
Dawn Ritz
published 3.5
3.42
Jennifer Spoons
published
3.41
Kelly Upton
published
3.31
Brianna Fluellen
published 3.5
3.29
ROSEMARY BATES
published
3.25
Jennifer Whitaker
published
3.25
Tonya Ball
published
3.24
Christine Fimbres
published 3.5
3.22
Leah Collins
published
3.15
Jean Sills
published
3.14
Kim Henke
published
3.10
Colleen Petersen
published 3.5
3.05
Shelley Hicks
published
2.99
Eve Lamendola
published 3.5
2.96
Pamela Ferrell
published
2.94
Gail Bayne
published
Kathryn Beasley
published
Katie Kerr
published
Kyla Obert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mollie Romness + Kimberly Bates10362% games+11.4% vs expected
Tonya Ball + Leah Collins303 matchesnot enough data
Jean Sills + Pamela Ferrell213 matchesnot enough data
Tara Cormier-Reeder + Christine Fimbres123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Kerr + Mollie Romness123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mollie Romness
25W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
Tara Cormier-Reeder
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Kimberly Bates
23W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Dawn Ritz
49W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.63
Jennifer Spoons
32W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Kelly Upton
26W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Brianna Fluellen
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
ROSEMARY BATES
25W–35L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Jennifer Whitaker
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Tonya Ball
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christine Fimbres
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Leah Collins
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Jean Sills
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kim Henke
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Colleen Petersen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Shelley Hicks
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Eve Lamendola
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Pamela Ferrell
37W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Barbara Shlesinger
14W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Gail Bayne
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Beasley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Kerr
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyla Obert
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.