Teams

DTC #1

2021 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 3.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-11-20Won 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Ruediger / Megan Bell vs Bambi Montag / Dixie Stephens7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlexis Hall vs Deborah Rogers6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Stiglic / Felicia McGhee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-13vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Ruediger / Beth Burns vs Sarah Kingsley / Rachel Smith6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Stiglic / Felicia McGhee vs Valerie Witherspoon / Miriam Pasimio4-6, 3-6
2021-11-06Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Ruediger / Beth Burns vs Ada Vera / Barbara Boser3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesChristi Lin vs BRI STECK6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeannie Sorenson / Diana Stiglic vs Nicole Gerhardt / Sonya Ladd3-6, 2-6
2021-10-30vs CANYON GATE #3Won 40
W#1 DoublesMegan Bell / Christi Lin vs Joeanna Parker / Gretchen Mersch6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAlexis Hall vs Monique Delphin6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Ruediger / Diana Stiglic vs Athene Garfield / Chelsea Nguyen6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaCheyva Edmonis / Jeannie Sorenson vs Martha Langer / Suzette LaGrange-Miranda6-1, 6-2
2021-10-23vs SPANISH OAKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristi Lin / Melissa Ruediger vs Rachael Boyle / Ashly Ryan3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlexis Hall vs Loretta Moses6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeannie Sorenson / Megan Bell vs Jocelyn Goldman / Kristy Andrade2-6, 3-6
2021-10-18vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 13
L#1 DoublesBeth Burns / Melissa Ruediger vs Racquel Toyozaki / Katrin Dragnev7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristi Lin vs Rose Gerrard3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeannie Sorenson / LaCheyva Edmonis vs Rachel Smith / Katie Jacobs7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFelicia McGhee / Diana Stiglic vs Sarah Kingsley / Miriam Pasimio1-6, 6-7
2021-10-16vs CANYON GATE #3Split 11
L#1 DoublesLaCheyva Edmonis / Melissa Ruediger vs Joeanna Parker / Gretchen Mersch1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristi Lin vs Liwei Li6-1, 6-2
2021-10-02Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLaCheyva Edmonis / Beth Burns vs Ada Vera / Barbara Boser5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlexis Hall vs Shawanna Johnson7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFelicia McGhee / Diana Stiglic vs Kim Espe / Cheryl Kypreos4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Chamberlain / Megan Bell vs Elizabeth Eshragh / Sonya Ladd1-6, 2-6
2021-09-25vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristi Lin / Melissa Ruediger vs Bambi Montag / Dixie Stephens6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlexis Hall vs Deborah Rogers6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeannie Sorenson / Kathleen Chamberlain vs Jeannie Collins / Mindy Polasky3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFelicia McGhee / Diana Stiglic vs Kristin Stowe / Teresa Desangro6-4, 7-5
2021-09-18Won 40
W#1 DoublesLaCheyva Edmonis / Melissa Ruediger vs RACQUEL DIZON / Kristy Andrade6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAlexis Hall vs Loretta Moses6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Burns / Christi Lin vs Jocelyn Goldman / Adrienne Berman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Stiglic / Megan Bell vs Megan Klunick / Philicia King6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexis Hall
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.56
Megan Bell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Kathleen Chamberlain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Christi Lin
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.31
Melissa Ruediger
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.06
LaCheyva Edmonis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Diana Stiglic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Kellie Woods
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
Jeannie Sorenson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaCheyva Edmonis + Melissa Ruediger3358% games+10.4% vs expected
LaCheyva Edmonis + Jeannie Sorenson5065% gamesnot enough data
Megan Bell + Melissa Ruediger314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexis Hall
28W–10L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Megan Bell
106W–70L career · 15 lines in 2021
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Kathleen Chamberlain
104W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Christi Lin
193W–120L career · 14 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Melissa Ruediger
151W–91L career · 13 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
LaCheyva Edmonis
218W–213L career · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Diana Stiglic
37W–38L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Kellie Woods
110W–46L career · 11 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.69
0
Jeannie Sorenson
46W–52L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.