Search

Diana Stiglic

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2024
75 matches · 37W–38L · seasons 20202024
Where Diana sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Diana is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Diana has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Diana has gone from the 56th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 50.1% of games
3.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 53.2% of games
5.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
L
Catherine Perez / Nicole Palichat
2024-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jihee Anh
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Geraldine Wright / Stacy Burr
2024-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jihee Anh
+0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-02-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roni Tarr
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Helen McDaniel / Jennifer Olson
2024-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Mier
0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Darlene Whittlesy / Brooke Rice
2024-02-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonja Rogers
0.061below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Robi Hinton / Melissa Arcella
2024-01-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Kelly
0.021below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Julie Schoolmeester / Jennifer Roberts
2024-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Kelly
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-01-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonja Rogers
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-12-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roni Tarr
0.001about as expected — took 60% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Margaret Bruno / Shaza Nayef
2023-12-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roni Tarr
+0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kristin Stowe / Nicole Palichat
2023-11-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Mier
0.046below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Melissa Saragosa / Melissa Ruediger
2023-11-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Mier
+0.021better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.