← Search

Melissa Saragosa

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
45 matches · 20W–25L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Melissa sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Melissa is one of 1468 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 33% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melissa has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Melissa has gone from the 58th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
42.1%
16W–22L · 49.3% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
L
Shi L Oskooi / Kellie Woods
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Kluger
+0.027better than expected — took 55% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Inman
+0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Mayela Moneo / Shiniqual Washington
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristy Andrade
−0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clay Ellish
−0.019below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Xin Wei / Debbie Fleury
2025-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Bender
−0.009below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Wooldridge
−0.011better than expected — took 92% of games against 82% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Geraldine Davis / DeVita Robinson
2025-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margo Isler
−0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Ellen Arcella / Karen Asquith
2025-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Bender
−0.054below expectation — took 67% of games against 81% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen McDaniel
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jill Morrison / Xin Wei
2024-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Kluger
−0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kellye Ray / Martha Langer
2024-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Addy Iveth Zilberman
−0.013about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Sharon Bauman / Jennifer Wang
2024-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Kluger
−0.007about as expected — took 68% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.