Teams

NJ: Ballboys

2025 55&Over Men · 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-28vs Team SongWon 20
W#1 DoublesVladi Tsipenyuk / Craig Sandler vs Joseph Iwanski / Kevin Proctor7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHenry Lanman / Jonathan Earl vs Andrew Song / Will Potter6-1, 6-1
2025-08-26vs Team SongWon 20
W#1 DoublesVladi Tsipenyuk / Chris Soulios vs Frank Dunne / Kevin Proctor6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJared Kaban / Francis Giglio vs Robert Mullarkey / Will Potter6-2, 6-0
2025-08-21vs Team SongWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglass Coyle / Jared Kaban vs Andrew Song / Frank Dunne6-1, 6-2
2025-08-19vs Team SongWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Soulios / Francis Giglio vs Joseph Iwanski / Robert Mullarkey6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJonathan Earl / Henry Lanman vs Kevin Proctor / Frank Dunne6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Berenbaum / Craig Sandler vs Andrew Song / Will Potter6-2, 6-4
2025-08-14vs Team SongWon 20
W#1 DoublesDouglass Coyle / Chris Soulios vs Joseph Iwanski / Will Potter6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVladi Tsipenyuk / Jared Kaban vs Andrew Song / Kevin Proctor6-0, 6-4
2025-08-12vs Team SongWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Sandler / Gabriel Topor vs Will Potter / Andrew Song6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Berenbaum / Francis Giglio vs Joseph Iwanski / Robert Mullarkey6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: Ballboys05150144
2Team Song0501530178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
David Berenbaum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.40
Vladi Tsipenyuk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.28
Chris Soulios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Jonathan Earl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Douglass Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Gabriel Topor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Craig Sandler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Jared Kaban
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Francis Giglio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Henry Lanman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Topor + Chris Soulios2442% gamesnot enough data
Chris Soulios + Vladi Tsipenyuk5160% gamesnot enough data
David Berenbaum + Gabriel Topor224 matchesnot enough data
Douglass Coyle + Chris Soulios134 matchesnot enough data
Douglass Coyle + Craig Sandler303 matchesnot enough data
Craig Sandler + Chris Soulios033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Berenbaum
33W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
4.46
Vladi Tsipenyuk
82W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Chris Soulios
42W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
Jonathan Earl
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
Douglass Coyle
24W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Gabriel Topor
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Craig Sandler
33W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
Jared Kaban
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Francis Giglio
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Henry Lanman
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.