Teams

18+ 4.5

2025 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 4.5 Adult Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-12vs Canon - MazarickLost 03
L#1 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Owen McGrew1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVisakan Jayakumar / Sergii Porokh vs Andrew Perdue / Royce Kim3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Jonathan Canon4-6, 4-6
2025-04-05vs Canon - MazarickLost 01
L#1 DoublesVisakan Jayakumar / Spencer Llewellyn vs Parv Mital / Wes Watson3-6, 3-6
2025-03-29vs Canon - MazarickLost 02
L#2 DoublesSpencer Llewellyn / Visakan Jayakumar vs Wes Watson / Parv Mital4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / Tyler Carroll vs Steve Musgrove / Rawle Sue-Ho6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Canon - MazarickLost 02
L#2 DoublesVisakan Jayakumar / Sergii Porokh vs Royce Kim / Andrew Perdue6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Owen McGrew1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Tyler Carroll
published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
published
4.23
Bryce Richards
published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Toni Cvitanic
published
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.82
Sergii Porokh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Matt Turbeville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Llewellyn + Matthew Hanauer9556% games+6.8% vs expected
Spencer Llewellyn + Visakan Jayakumar4155% gamesnot enough data
Tyler Carroll + Visakan Jayakumar314 matchesnot enough data
Maxwell Gregson + Visakan Jayakumar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Carroll
22W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Visakan Jayakumar
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Bryce Richards
58W–38L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Toni Cvitanic
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Maxwell Gregson
23W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Sergii Porokh
106W–114L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Matt Turbeville
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.