Teams

KNO PURPLE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs HG GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Ehlinger / MaryLynn Thompson vs Dina Clifford / Ashley Sinton3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMeagan Schreiber vs Kristin Keller Herndon6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDanielle Gloege / Julie Madden vs Marisa Benway / Sharon Fons5-7, 4-6
2026-07-06vs RRTC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesMolly Ehlinger / Meagan Schreiber vs Shannon Elam / Kristin Chapman1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKarla Goodhart vs Rita Fitzpatrick4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Madden / Elizabeth Glenn vs Michelle McDonald / Becky Adams1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaryLynn Thompson / Danielle Gloege vs Miranda Ku / Jessica Peterson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-29vs SS-H GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesKarla Goodhart / Julie Madden vs Jeanne Cole / Linda McOsker6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Warlick vs Tracy Sickels7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeagan Schreiber / Elizabeth Glenn vs Kathryn Root / Nancy Carlson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Ehlinger / MaryLynn Thompson vs Carol Fowler / Stacie Cowell6-1, 7-5
2026-06-22vs HFII REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Klepacka / Lisa Warlick vs Danielle Panzarino / Stephanie Tomeo6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Gloege / Molly Ehlinger vs Deandra Knowles / Rachel Nance6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichelle Price / Julie Madden vs Meredith Wolf / Danielle Drohan3-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs SS-LT NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Klepacka / Danielle Gloege vs Amy Koldyke / Sheila Marino6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Warlick vs Robin DiCicco5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKarla Goodhart / Michelle Price vs Ingrid Burke / Tara Crockett6-7, 2-6
2026-06-08vs WC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesMeagan Schreiber / Diane Klepacka vs Mary Brady / Andrea Gee4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Warlick vs Andrea Kolbet2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanielle Gloege / Michelle Price vs Brooke Lorenz / Brigit McNair4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Madden / Elizabeth Glenn vs JESSICA MORTON / Angela Jones2-6, 5-7
2026-06-01vs HW REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesMeagan Schreiber / Karla Goodhart vs Shelly Russell / Sandi Bozanic2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Glenn vs Sarah Erickson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Gloege / MaryLynn Thompson vs Meaghan McGee / Nicole Moore6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Ehlinger / Diane Klepacka vs Geniella Lester / Jillian Hill6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Diane Klepacka
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Lisa Warlick
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Meagan Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
MaryLynn Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.51
Michelle Price
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Julie Madden
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.47
Molly Ehlinger
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.41
Danielle Gloege
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.31
Karla Goodhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.06
Elizabeth Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Klepacka + Molly Ehlinger6361% games+10.3% vs expected
Molly Ehlinger + Karla Goodhart4351% games+9.5% vs expected
Karla Goodhart + Danielle Gloege3256% games+9.4% vs expected
Molly Ehlinger + Danielle Gloege4451% games+4.8% vs expected
Diane Klepacka + Danielle Gloege8353% games+3.1% vs expected
Julie Madden + Danielle Gloege4255% games+1.1% vs expected
Julie Madden + Elizabeth Glenn2344% games−0.2% vs expected
Julie Madden + MaryLynn Thompson044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Klepacka
39W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Lisa Warlick
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Meagan Schreiber
32W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
MaryLynn Thompson
25W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Michelle Price
24W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Julie Madden
27W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Molly Ehlinger
27W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Danielle Gloege
28W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
Karla Goodhart
22W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Elizabeth Glenn
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.