Teams

HFII RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs SS-LT NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Panzarino / Erika Troyer vs Amy Koldyke / Heather Kuzma4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Fraser / Marsha Visscher vs Sara Percival / Sheila Marino4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Wolf / Angela Hansen vs Ingrid Burke / Rebecca Dalzell4-6, 3-6
2026-07-06Won 30
W#1 DoublesDana McHale / Danielle Panzarino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Drohan / Erika Troyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarsha Visscher / Laura Fraser vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-29vs HW REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesDana McHale / Erika Troyer vs Nicole Moore / Shelly Russell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDeandra Knowles vs Meaghan McGee2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Drohan / Rachel Nance vs Geniella Lester / Crystal Eustis4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Wolf / Stephanie Tomeo vs Jessica Stretz Storm / Jillian Hill4-6, 3-6
2026-06-22vs KNO PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesDanielle Panzarino / Stephanie Tomeo vs Diane Klepacka / Lisa Warlick2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErika Troyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDeandra Knowles / Rachel Nance vs Danielle Gloege / Molly Ehlinger2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMeredith Wolf / Danielle Drohan vs Michelle Price / Julie Madden6-3, 6-1
2026-06-15vs RRTC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesDana McHale / Erika Troyer vs Shannon Elam / Karen Miao6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDanielle Panzarino vs Kristina Moore6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Fraser / Deandra Knowles vs Rita Fitzpatrick / Miranda Ku4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Wolf / Rachel Nance vs Becky Adams / Jessica Peterson2-6, 1-6
2026-06-08vs SS-H GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesErika Troyer / Dana McHale vs Linda McOsker / Tracy Sickels6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMarsha Visscher vs Deborah Cartwright5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Hansen / Rachel Nance vs Kathryn Root / Kathy Reiner3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Drohan / Deandra Knowles vs Stacie Cowell / Lori Honnen6-4, 6-0
2026-06-01vs HG GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDanielle Panzarino / Erika Troyer vs Sarah Bernauer / Ashley Sinton6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDana McHale vs Gina Caton4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Nelson / Danielle Drohan vs Anne Kocur / Dina Clifford3-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Fraser / Deandra Knowles vs Kristina Paul / Kristin Keller Herndon6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Danielle Panzarino
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.83
Erika Troyer
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.81
Dana McHale
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Amanda Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Danielle Drohan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Stephanie Tomeo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Meredith Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Angela Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Deandra Knowles
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.47
Rachel Nance
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Laura Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Marsha Visscher
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Fraser + Deandra Knowles7263% games+11.1% vs expected
Dana McHale + Danielle Panzarino8460% games+3.1% vs expected
Danielle Drohan + Angela Hansen5850% games+3.1% vs expected
Dana McHale + Erika Troyer6063% games+2.4% vs expected
Rachel Nance + Stephanie Tomeo3746% games−1.5% vs expected
Dana McHale + Marsha Visscher8654% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Drohan + Rachel Nance123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Hansen + Stephanie Tomeo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Danielle Panzarino
46W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Erika Troyer
93W–43L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Dana McHale
51W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Amanda Nelson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Danielle Drohan
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Stephanie Tomeo
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Meredith Wolf
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Angela Hansen
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Deandra Knowles
15W–8L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Rachel Nance
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Laura Fraser
20W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Marsha Visscher
42W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.