Teams

RRTC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs HW REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesShannon Elam / Karen Miao vs Crystal Eustis / Nicole Moore6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKristina Moore vs Geniella Lester6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle McDonald / Becky Adams vs Brianna Gass / Shelly Russell6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMiranda Ku / Jessica Peterson vs Jessica Stretz Storm / Jillian Hill3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-07-06vs KNO PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesShannon Elam / Kristin Chapman vs Molly Ehlinger / Meagan Schreiber6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRita Fitzpatrick vs Karla Goodhart6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle McDonald / Becky Adams vs Julie Madden / Elizabeth Glenn6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMiranda Ku / Jessica Peterson vs MaryLynn Thompson / Danielle Gloege4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-29vs HG GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Chapman / Michelle McDonald vs Dina Clifford / Anne Packer6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKristina Moore vs Kristin Keller Herndon6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Elam / Karen Miao vs Ashley Sinton / Kristina Paul6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBecky Adams / Miranda Ku vs Anne Kocur / Sharon Fons6-1, 6-3
2026-06-22vs SS-H GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Chapman / Karen Miao vs Jeanne Cole / Deborah Cartwright6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Tracy Sickels7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle McDonald / Miranda Ku vs Nancy Carlson / Kathy Reiner3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRita Fitzpatrick / Kristina Moore vs Lori Honnen / Carol Fowler6-2, 6-3
2026-06-15vs HFII REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesShannon Elam / Karen Miao vs Dana McHale / Erika Troyer2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKristina Moore vs Danielle Panzarino7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRita Fitzpatrick / Miranda Ku vs Laura Fraser / Deandra Knowles6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Adams / Jessica Peterson vs Meredith Wolf / Rachel Nance6-2, 6-1
2026-06-08vs SS-LT NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesShannon Elam / Karen Miao vs Beth Reedy / Robin DiCicco5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristina Moore vs Sheila Marino6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMiranda Ku / Rita Fitzpatrick vs Ingrid Burke / Amy Koldyke6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBecky Adams / Kristin Chapman vs Tara Crockett / Rebecca Dalzell7-5, 6-4
2026-06-01vs WC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesBecky Adams / Shannon Elam vs Brooke Lorenz / Andrea Kolbet2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMiranda Ku vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristina Moore / Michelle McDonald vs Andrea Gee / Karen Steketee5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica Peterson / Rita Fitzpatrick vs Angela Jones / Brigit McNair6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Kristin Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Karen Miao
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Becky Adams
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Miranda Ku
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.83
Shannon Elam
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.82
Kristina Moore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.81
Rita Fitzpatrick
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Michelle McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.53
Jessica Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Peterson + Rita Fitzpatrick3257% games+12.2% vs expected
Miranda Ku + Michelle McDonald5354% games+7.7% vs expected
Shannon Elam + Karen Miao7652% games−0.9% vs expected
Miranda Ku + Rita Fitzpatrick5355% games−2.2% vs expected
Kristin Chapman + Shannon Elam314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle McDonald + Karen Miao224 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Elam + Miranda Ku303 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Peterson + Michelle McDonald123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Chapman
36W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Karen Miao
38W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Becky Adams
19W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Miranda Ku
33W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Shannon Elam
46W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Kristina Moore
18W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Rita Fitzpatrick
37W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Michelle McDonald
39W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Jessica Peterson
13W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.