Teams

High Point/Davis-Jenkins W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs Stonebriar/Woodson W4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Neal / Claudia Villegas vs Erin Scannell / April Murphy6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEileen Kendall / Kerry Kavanaugh vs Carrie Devries / Claudia Stewart2-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs DAC/Fellman-Jolly W4.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesRebecca Neal / Kristina Ward vs Yvette Freeman / Megan Fellman2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Whitaker / Elizabeth Shaw vs Laura Jolly / Shelly Tompkins6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Keith / Hope Heldmar vs Ryane Criswell / Julie Hoang4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-29vs DCC/Beecherl W4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Keith / Kim Osborne vs Katherine Herron / Brandi Chilian4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Neal / Claudia Villegas vs Cynthia Beecherl / Holly Lawrence6-4, 6-3
2025-05-22vs Garland/Smith-Bradley W4.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesRuth Oyler / Kerry Kavanaugh vs Jennifer Young / Michelle Hefner7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHope Heldmar / Claudia Villegas vs Renee Aaron / Holly Simmons2-6, 4-6
2025-05-15vs RGAC/Hill W4.0Won 31
L#1 DoublesHope Heldmar / Kristina Ward vs Lauren Reid / Kelley Stark3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie McCoy / Claudia Villegas vs Jennifer Hill / Donelle Raley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChristine Keith vs Julie Fecht6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKerry Kavanaugh / Ruth Oyler vs Phine Kalonji / Christina Lafferty6-2, 6-2
2025-05-12vs Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesThea Junt / Stephanie Whitaker vs Tricia Roos / Louise Bexley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEileen Kendall / Darla Scherz vs Lola Lott / Shannon Hogan1-6, 2-5
2025-05-08vs Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesChristine Keith vs Suzi Donaghe3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie McCoy / Claudia Villegas vs Chris Sonnen / Courtney Jordan5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAundi Henderson / Eileen Kendall vs Amanda Hurst / Megan Boyle4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Thea Junt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.90
Ruth Oyler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Amy Dungan
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Li Su
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Darla Scherz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Christine Keith
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.75
Hope Heldmar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Claudia Villegas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Staci Frost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Aundi Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Eileen Kendall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacqueline Jenkins
published
Kerry Kavanaugh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kristina Ward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Neal
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Stephanie Whitaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Villegas + Stephanie Whitaker314 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Villegas + Ruth Oyler213 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Villegas + Rebecca Neal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thea Junt
43W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Ruth Oyler
15W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Amy Dungan
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Li Su
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Darla Scherz
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Christine Keith
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Hope Heldmar
20W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Claudia Villegas
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Staci Frost
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Aundi Henderson
24W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Eileen Kendall
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacqueline Jenkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Kavanaugh
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristina Ward
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Neal
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Whitaker
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.