Teams

DCC/Beecherl W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Herron / Kelsie Sumner vs Emily Laurence / Courtney Jordan6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlden Fontaine vs Amanda Hurst6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHolly Lawrence / Anne Lindsey Hunt vs SHELLEY ARKELL / Megan Boyle3-6, 5-7
2025-06-25vs Stonebriar/Woodson W4.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Lee / Katherine Herron vs Michelle Woodson / Cheryl Thomas1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesHaylie Crouch vs Andrea Tuttle7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKelsie Sumner / Holly Lawrence vs Julie Dickson / Connie Ewing2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAnne Lindsey Hunt vs Happy Mason4-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesKatherine Herron / Emily Lee vs Lola Lott / Tricia Roos4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlden Fontaine vs Shannon Hogan3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Lawrence / Kelsie Sumner vs Devon Bowling / Heather Neilson6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesHaylie Crouch vs Tina Kimbell6-2, 6-1
2025-06-05vs DAC/Fellman-Jolly W4.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesKatherine Herron / Emily Lee vs Yvette Freeman / Melissa Sevilla4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHaylie Crouch / Kelsie Sumner vs Shelly Tompkins / Elizabeth McCrary3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-29vs High Point/Davis-Jenkins W4.0Lost 13
W#1 DoublesKatherine Herron / Brandi Chilian vs Christine Keith / Kim Osborne6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHaylie Crouch vs Amy Dungan0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Beecherl / Holly Lawrence vs Rebecca Neal / Claudia Villegas4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCassandra Johnson / Leigh Sands vs Ruth Oyler / Aundi Henderson3-6, 1-6
2025-05-22Split 22
L#1 SinglesMary Rebecca Bell vs April Parker4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatherine Herron / Holly Lawrence vs Heather Helsel / Susan Quill4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnne Lindsey Hunt vs Hilary McNamara6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Thomason / Kim Wyly vs Erika Meade / Julie Hoang4-6, 5-7
2025-05-19vs RGAC/Hill W4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Lee / Melanie Schoenvogel vs Lauren Reid / Charlotte Dixon6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Lawrence / Kelsie Sumner vs Jennifer Hill / Donelle Raley6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHaylie Crouch vs Anya Preece6-2, 6-3
2025-05-08vs Garland/Smith-Bradley W4.0Lost 13
W#1 DoublesKelsie Sumner / Emily Lee vs Jennifer Young / Michelle Hefner6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlden Fontaine vs Reshma Ganapathy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHaylie Crouch / Kim Wyly vs Bonnie Shea / Renee Aaron2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Sands / Susan Thompson vs Amber Morefield / Cheryl Bradley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point/Soldan-Dove W4.080291128275
2Greenhill/Newberg-Schonwald W4.07132822263
3Lakes/Buckalew-Criswell W4.071271336339
4Garland/Smith-Bradley W4.071241637325
5Colleyville Park/Coffindaffer W4.0 (F2025 WC)62281232300
6Greenhill/Nevelow W4.062241638329
7Samuell Grand/McGill-Beirute W4.062241638329
8High Point/Davis-Jenkins W4.062221842364
9Royal Oaks/Munir W4.062202045343
10Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.053291127299
11Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.053241636335
12Oak Creek/Jackson-Trousil W4.053231739349
13Canyon Creek/Kramer-Thomas W4.053221839325
14SMU/Park W4.044241640335
15McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.044221844361
16DCC/Beecherl W4.044211945361
17DAC/Fellman-Jolly W4.035211947391
18Huffhines/Ethington W4.035172353399
19DAC/Moore-Carothers W4.035132760409
20Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.026172353383
21Gleneagles/Shukis-Lofgren W4.026142653385
22Stonebriar/Woodson W4.026132756396
23McKinney/Cady W4.017152553386
24The Nelson/Wood W4.017152554384
25RGAC/Hill W4.008112959410
26Lakewood/Diaz-Dix W4.00863472452
27T bar M/Dodgen-LaRosen W4.00833776466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Katherine Herron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Holly Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jacky Pincoffs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Alden Fontaine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Cynthia Beecherl
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Jennifer Coats
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.66
Melanie Schoenvogel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Brandi Chilian
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Haylie Crouch
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.35
Leigh Sands
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Christine Danuser
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Anne Lindsey Hunt
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Mason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janina Solomon
published
Kate LaGere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsie Sumner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Wyly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Thomason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Rebecca Bell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Phyllis McKnight
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate LaGere + Jacky Pincoffs3257% gamesnot enough data
Kelsie Sumner + Holly Lawrence213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Herron + Brandi Chilian213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Herron
18W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Holly Lawrence
10W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Jacky Pincoffs
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Alden Fontaine
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cynthia Beecherl
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Coats
19W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.67
Melanie Schoenvogel
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Brandi Chilian
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Haylie Crouch
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.59
Leigh Sands
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Christine Danuser
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Anne Lindsey Hunt
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Mason
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janina Solomon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate LaGere
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsie Sumner
7W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Wyly
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Thomason
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Rebecca Bell
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Phyllis McKnight
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.