Teams

Huffhines/Ethington W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

19 players · average NTRP 3.93 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Sipes / Doreen Thomas vs Elizabeth Nevelow / Julie Murray7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLinsey Ethington / Jennifer Gentile vs Kristen Lampe / Lani Trieu1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDoreen Thomas / Melissa Sipes vs Taylor Montesi / Jo Ann Compton0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-19vs Royal Oaks/Munir W4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Sipes / Mary Alyce Kaetzel vs Julie Parolisi / Tiffany Gerard1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Pappous / Jenna Xiong vs Christy Abbott / Debbie Munir6-3, 6-4
2025-06-05vs Lakewood/Diaz-Dix W4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Sipes / Jill Nail vs Kerri Johnson / Elizabeth Lamberson6-4, 6-4
2025-05-22vs McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJill Nail / Lynelle Reynolds vs Amy Farrell / Sarah Haskins6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCindy Pappous / Jenna Xiong vs Emily Chapman / Tanya Clay6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Gentile vs Theresa Lane5-7, 3-6
2025-05-15Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJennifer Gentile vs Kristen Anderson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-09vs Samuell Grand/McGill-Beirute W4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Seaton / Melissa Sipes vs Lisa Lajous / Holly Lewis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-08vs The Nelson/Wood W4.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesCindy Pappous / Jenna Xiong vs Maria Moujan / Victoria Tanco3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynelle Reynolds / Cristin Pike vs Laurie Spicer / Laura Adams6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point/Soldan-Dove W4.080291128275
2Greenhill/Newberg-Schonwald W4.07132822263
3Lakes/Buckalew-Criswell W4.071271336339
4Garland/Smith-Bradley W4.071241637325
5Colleyville Park/Coffindaffer W4.0 (F2025 WC)62281232300
6Greenhill/Nevelow W4.062241638329
7Samuell Grand/McGill-Beirute W4.062241638329
8High Point/Davis-Jenkins W4.062221842364
9Royal Oaks/Munir W4.062202045343
10Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.053291127299
11Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.053241636335
12Oak Creek/Jackson-Trousil W4.053231739349
13Canyon Creek/Kramer-Thomas W4.053221839325
14SMU/Park W4.044241640335
15McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.044221844361
16DCC/Beecherl W4.044211945361
17DAC/Fellman-Jolly W4.035211947391
18Huffhines/Ethington W4.035172353399
19DAC/Moore-Carothers W4.035132760409
20Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.026172353383
21Gleneagles/Shukis-Lofgren W4.026142653385
22Stonebriar/Woodson W4.026132756396
23McKinney/Cady W4.017152553386
24The Nelson/Wood W4.017152554384
25RGAC/Hill W4.008112959410
26Lakewood/Diaz-Dix W4.00863472452
27T bar M/Dodgen-LaRosen W4.00833776466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Cindy Pappous
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Jenna Xiong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ava Verchimak
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Cindy Taylor
published 4
3.74
Valerie van Ausdall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Jill Nail
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Linsey Ethington
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.67
Sundee McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.66
Sandy Seaton
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.65
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.61
Aimee Cali
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Melissa Sipes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Doreen Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.48
Joulia Prous
published
3.48
Cristin Pike
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.40
Cristen Deteau
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.34
Jennifer Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Jennifer Gentile
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lynelle Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Dugan + Sundee McDonald3355% games+10.1% vs expected
Jenna Xiong + Cindy Pappous11754% games−2.0% vs expected
Mary Alyce Kaetzel + Sundee McDonald6747% games−9.6% vs expected
Cristin Pike + Jennifer Dugan4451% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Seaton + Doreen Thomas1440% gamesnot enough data
Valerie van Ausdall + Doreen Thomas1447% gamesnot enough data
Cristin Pike + Mary Alyce Kaetzel2348% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Seaton + Melissa Sipes134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Pappous
26W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Jenna Xiong
36W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Ava Verchimak
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cindy Taylor
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie van Ausdall
21W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Jill Nail
15W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Linsey Ethington
17W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Sundee McDonald
22W–37L career · 10 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Sandy Seaton
17W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
32W–30L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Aimee Cali
11W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Melissa Sipes
6W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Doreen Thomas
16W–29L career · 10 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Joulia Prous
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Cristin Pike
27W–27L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
4
Cristen Deteau
5W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Jennifer Dugan
20W–30L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jennifer Gentile
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynelle Reynolds
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.